IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v16y2026i2p271.html

Reporting Verbs in ELT Research Discussions: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Thai Scholars and International Editor-Authors

Author

Listed:
  • Natthaphong Sirijanchuen
  • Supakorn Phoocharoensil

Abstract

Academic writing often requires authors to position their work in relation to previous studies, frequently through the use of reporting verbs (RVs). These verbs are essential rhetorical tools for presenting findings, evaluating prior research, and engaging with readers. This study investigates the use of RVs in the discussion sections of English language teaching (ELT) research articles written by Thai scholars (TS) and international editor-authors (IE), the scholars who also hold editorial roles in top-tier journals. Drawing on Hyland's (2002) classification of RVs, the study compares the frequency and rhetorical functions of the most commonly used RVs in two balanced corpora of 20 discussion sections each. Using both corpus-based and qualitative content analysis, the study reveals key cross-cultural differences. Thai scholars tended to employ more RVs overall and showed a stronger preference for discourse-oriented verbs, while international editor-authors favored research-oriented verbs. These findings highlight differing rhetorical conventions in academic writing and suggest that a deeper awareness of RV use may help novice scholars enhance the clarity and persuasiveness of their academic writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Natthaphong Sirijanchuen & Supakorn Phoocharoensil, 2026. "Reporting Verbs in ELT Research Discussions: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Thai Scholars and International Editor-Authors," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(2), pages 271-271, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/28278/17375
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/28278
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.