IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v16y2026i2p258.html

Examining the Efficacy of ChatGPT and Human-Derived Corrective Feedback in Addressing Grammatical Errors in Saudi EFL Students' Compositions

Author

Listed:
  • Fawaz Al Mahmud

Abstract

Employing an explanatory mixed-methods approach, this study compared the affordances of ChatGPT' s written corrective feedback (WCF) and human corrective feedback in fostering linguistic accuracy among Saudi EFL learners. Participants were 53 undergraduates at the University of Jeddah, divided into an experimental group (n = 26) and a control group (n = 27). Over eight weeks, both groups engaged in two 1.5-hour writing sessions per week. The experimental group received WCF from ChatGPT, while the control group received human WCF. Pretests and posttests assessed participants' grammatical competence before and after the intervention. Error-flagging accuracy was evaluated by a panel of experienced university teachers of English. Semi-structured interviews with six experimental-group participants explored perceptions of ChatGPT. Quantitative findings indicated that ChatGPT was a more effective source of WCF than human feedback, as the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the posttest. However, human feedback was slightly more accurate in error-flagging. Qualitative results revealed that most students valued ChatGPT for its precise error identification, though some considered human feedback clearer in explanation. The study concludes that ChatGPT can serve as a valuable supplementary tool for corrective feedback in Saudi EFL writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Fawaz Al Mahmud, 2026. "Examining the Efficacy of ChatGPT and Human-Derived Corrective Feedback in Addressing Grammatical Errors in Saudi EFL Students' Compositions," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(2), pages 258-258, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/28189/17374
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/28189
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.