IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v15y2025i4p111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Process Drama on English Speaking Competence among Undergraduate EFL Learners in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shujie Luo
  • Lilliati Ismail
  • Norhakimah Khaiessa binti Ahmad
  • Qian Guo

Abstract

Process drama has been widely utilized in educational settings to enhance student engagement and achieve communicative goals. Despite its growing application, there is limited empirical evidence assessing its effectiveness specifically for improving English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speaking competence among undergraduate students in China. This study investigates the efficacy of process drama in enhancing EFL speaking competence among non-English major undergraduates in China. A total of 84 participants were involved, with 42 assigned to an experimental group (EG) that received process drama-based instruction, and 42 to a control group (CG) that followed conventional teaching methods. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests evaluating speaking competence. The analysis employed paired samples t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANCOVA to compare the pre- and post-test results. The results demonstrated significant improvements in speaking competence in both groups; however, ANCOVA revealed that the EG exhibited significantly greater improvement compared to the CG (p = .003). This study confirms that process drama is significantly more effective than conventional teaching methods in enhancing English speaking competence, providing novel insights into the specific benefits of process drama, highlighting its potential to address the limitations of traditional teaching approaches and offering a valuable contribution to the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Shujie Luo & Lilliati Ismail & Norhakimah Khaiessa binti Ahmad & Qian Guo, 2025. "Effects of Process Drama on English Speaking Competence among Undergraduate EFL Learners in China," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(4), pages 111-111, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/26679/16810
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/26679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.