IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v15y2025i3p65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Literature Review on Evaluation of English Language Textbooks: A Decade of Research

Author

Listed:
  • Yaxiong Li
  • Ramiza Haji Darmi
  • Yap Ngee Thai

Abstract

Textbooks, essential for teaching and learning, have become a burgeoning research subject in education. However, textbook evaluation has not garnered adequate attention in the context of English Language Teaching (ELT). This hinders the identification of key characteristics, focused learning themes, and gaps encountered within the EFL/ESL educational landscape. This systematic literature review, employing the ROSES framework, explores key characteristics and learning themes within English language textbook evaluation in the ELT context, identifying suggestions for future evaluations. The review involves searching, screening, evaluating, and synthesizing pertinent articles published in the last decade, from 2014 to 2023, across Scopus and Web of Science databases. Out of 2304 articles identified through a search of keywords including "textbook" and "evaluation" alongside their synonyms, 30 studies meeting the inclusion criteria are shortlisted after the quality appraisal using MMAT. The review finds that questionnaires, surveys and checklists were the most common methods used for ELT textbooks. Based on the findings from the review, this paper discusses a wide range of indicators or criteria involved in evaluating ELT textbooks, particularly in the evaluation of culture and pragmatics. Our research has revealed a need for in-depth exploration using qualitative and mixed-methods approaches, emphasizing the necessity for broader comparative studies and a more diverse range of perspectives in educational assessments to bridge knowledge gaps. This study suggests that further research on textbook evaluation in the ELT context is still necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaxiong Li & Ramiza Haji Darmi & Yap Ngee Thai, 2025. "Systematic Literature Review on Evaluation of English Language Textbooks: A Decade of Research," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(3), pages 1-65, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/26104/16798
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/26104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.