IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v15y2025i3p354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on Arabic Lexical Ambiguities: A Comparative Study with Traditional Machine Translation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hamad Abdullah H Aldawsari

Abstract

The rapid advancement in natural language processing (NLP) has led to the development of large language models (LLMs) with impressive capabilities in various tasks, including machine translation. However, the effectiveness of these new systems in handling linguistic complexities, such as Arabic lexical ambiguity, remains underexplored. This study investigates whether LLMs can outperform traditional machine translation (MT) systems in translating Arabic lexical ambiguities, characterized by homonyms, heteronyms, and polysemes. The evaluation involves two prominent LLMs, OpenAI's GPT and Google's Gemini, and compares their performance with traditional MT systems, Google Translate and SYSTRAN. The results indicate that GPT and Gemini offer substantial improvements in translation accuracy and intelligibility over traditional MT systems and highlight the advanced capabilities of LLMs in handling the complexities of Arabic, suggesting a significant step forward in machine translation technologies. This study highlights the potential of LLMs to overcome the limitations of traditional MT systems and provides a foundation for future research. The results contribute to the ongoing development of more effective and accurate translation systems, emphasizing the importance of adopting advanced AI technologies in the field of machine translation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamad Abdullah H Aldawsari, 2025. "Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on Arabic Lexical Ambiguities: A Comparative Study with Traditional Machine Translation Systems," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(3), pages 354-354, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/27261/16748
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/27261
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.