IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v13y2023i8p210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Teachers’ Views on Different Techniques for Teaching Foreign Languages in the Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Resmi Resmi
  • Abdul Rahman
  • Bobur Sobirov
  • Rumbardi Rumbardi
  • Nabil Al-Awawdeh
  • Heru Widoyo
  • Herman Herman
  • Nanda Saputra

Abstract

Attempts have been made to understand how teachers see different methods of teaching foreign languages. Also, numerous approaches and techniques have been used to improve the process of teaching foreign languages. These techniques have always been scrutinized for their perceived effectiveness and frequency of usage by the teachers. On the one hand, each approach is time-specific and may solve the issues of language instruction and learning at that point sufficiently; on the other, its flaws are revealed, making way for a new approach. This article aims at presenting an assessment of the frequency of usage of different teaching methods and techniques in foreign language learning, explicating the views of the foreign language teachers and evaluating the level of effectiveness. The study community include 200 foreign languages teachers drawn across various locations. There was no target on a particular foreign language, and the teachers participated through responding to questionnaires inputs. The 200 teachers polled for the study presented their views on the viability of six different teaching methods and strategies, including the direct or natural method, the hybrid method, the simulated experiment approach, the communicative strategy, the computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), and the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Data was collected using structured questionnaire, and analysis was conducted using relevant statistical measures, including the calculation of the frequencies and percentile values of the views of the respondents. The survey result indicated that the direct or natural method, and the communicative method are not frequently used by the teachers. The participated teachers further affirm that hybrid method is the most current effective method, followed by the CALL, CLIL and Simulated learning method. In terms of effectiveness of method, the result indicated that hybrid method and simulated method are the most effective teaching method. It was further shown in the analysis that foreign languages teachers in high schools must pay attention to the impacts of digital tools in facilitating language learning and improve learner’s communication ability. School leaders must incorporate the views of teachers on best methods for foreign language learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Resmi Resmi & Abdul Rahman & Bobur Sobirov & Rumbardi Rumbardi & Nabil Al-Awawdeh & Heru Widoyo & Herman Herman & Nanda Saputra, 2023. "Incorporating Teachers’ Views on Different Techniques for Teaching Foreign Languages in the Classroom," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(8), pages 210-210, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/24442/15201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/24442
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.