IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v13y2023i5p365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pragmatic and Semantic Analysis of EFL Learners’ Use of Modal Verbs: A Perception Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Yahya Almakrob
  • Wejdan Abdullah Altamimi
  • Reema Sliman Altaweel

Abstract

The current study, which employed a new analysis approach -an explicit and implicit data collection method-, investigates the perception of the English modal verbs by forty-six Saudi EFL undergraduate learners. Findings revealed that Saudi EFL students struggled with the semantic functions of English modals more than the pragmatic ones. Deontic possibility modal verbs like can and might were the most challenging forms for the EFL learners. Functional complexity, input frequency, students’ L1 influence, and cultural variation were thought to cause students’ misunderstanding of these modals. Students, on the other hand, appeared to perceive the pragmatic functions with ease, reinforcing the role of the input frequency in the acquisition of English modality because modals of Request, Suggestion and Offer are frequently introduced to students in the classroom. Furthermore, findings revealed that students’ performance in the perception test was better than the explicit one, which could be attributed to the lack of explicit instruction of the English modals. Some pedagogical implications were suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Yahya Almakrob & Wejdan Abdullah Altamimi & Reema Sliman Altaweel, 2023. "A Pragmatic and Semantic Analysis of EFL Learners’ Use of Modal Verbs: A Perception Study," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(5), pages 365-365, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/23610/14723
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/23610
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.