IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v12y2022i6p19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media Representation of States Involved in the South China Sea Dispute: International News in Context

Author

Listed:
  • Phyll Jhann E. Gildore
  • Christian Jay O. Syting

Abstract

The media has discursively represented China, the Philippines, and the United States as states involved in territorial disputes in the South China Sea. These discursive representations ultimately pervade the media and public spheres. This study aimed to unravel these media representations by employing Halliday’s transitivity analysis and van Djik’s notion of ideological squares in analyzing news articles of the dispute from leading international news media. The analyses uncovered that China, the Philippines, and the United States are depicted to be actively involved in the dispute. The articles depict China’s assertive and aggressive measures in the disputed waters and against the United States. China is likewise portrayed to be favoring efforts to forward diplomatic resolutions in the region. The United States is depicted as aggressive towards China while maintaining a projection of power and intimidation in the region as the security guarantor. The Philippines, moreover, is portrayed to advance its claims in the context of forwarding aggressive policies, diplomatic protest, and negotiations and proposals for diplomatic resolutions, all while balancing relations with the US and China. These discursive representations demonstrate how the media has construed and constructed for the public the states involved in the territorial dispute.

Suggested Citation

  • Phyll Jhann E. Gildore & Christian Jay O. Syting, 2022. "Media Representation of States Involved in the South China Sea Dispute: International News in Context," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/22057/13759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/22057
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.