IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v4y2015i4p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Faculty Learning Community for Non-Tenure Track Professors

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Bond

Abstract

Non-tenure track faculty vary greatly in terms of their ranks, teaching abilities, workloads, and motivational levels and have unique professional development needs. In response, universities are differentiating professional development for these professors. This case study examined an emerging research university’s efforts to provide a faculty learning community (FLC) for its non-tenure track professors. Data were collected during an academic year from interviews with the participants, evaluations completed by the participants after the meetings, and the facilitators’ curricular materials. The participants learned useful instructional strategies and felt more connected to their colleagues, more supported by the university, and more confident in their teaching. The findings suggest that FLCs are a viable method of professional development for non-tenure track faculty.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Bond, 2015. "Developing a Faculty Learning Community for Non-Tenure Track Professors," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/7623/5213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/7623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Furco & Barbara E. Moely, 2012. "Using Learning Communities to Build Faculty Support for Pedagogical Innovation: A Multi-Campus Study," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 128-153, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.