Author
Abstract
This study examined the educational effects of introducing a preparatory posting board (PPB) within a university learning management system. The research focused on post-lecture reflection quality through one-minute paper analyses, specifically examining how activating and externalizing prior knowledge through pre-lecture postings influences students’ understanding of lecture content. Study 1 assigned 286 university students enrolled in on-demand lectures to either a full condition, where the PPB was available from the beginning, or a delayed condition, where it was introduced later. Results showed that students in the full condition engaged in high-quality reflection from the outset, integrating prior knowledge with newly acquired lecture content. In the delayed condition, a level of integrative reflection comparable to that of the full condition was attained following the introduction of the PPB. Study 2 replicated this pattern, but with 141 students attending face-to-face lectures. Both studies found little spontaneous inference or elaboration beyond lecture content. Building upon Study 2, Study 3 explored whether providing opportunities for students to share opinions during face-to-face lecture preparation (beyond the PPB) was associated with enhanced reflection and spontaneous reasoning. Specifically, 234 students were assigned to preparation-only (no peer discussion) or preparation–discussion (five-minute peer discussion) conditions while attending face-to-face lectures. Results found that higher-order reflection improved significantly in the preparation–discussion condition. Collectively, these findings suggest that while externalizing prior knowledge during preparation facilitates integrative understanding, learning environments that encourage comparative thinking and actively engaging with peers’ perspectives are essential for fostering spontaneous reasoning in post-lecture reflections.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.