IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijba11/v11y2020i2p28-38.html

Determinants of Audit Sanctions Severity

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Azzali
  • Tatiana Mazza

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of material weaknesses from auditing standards and of material misstatement from accounting standards on the audit sanctions severity. Using a unique database in the period 1983 ¨C 2015, we find mixed results. Among the auditing standards, Internal Control Weaknesses lead to more severe audit sanctions than Quality Control, Other Auditors, Reporting and Audit Opinion Material Weaknesses Audit Sanctions, and to less severe audit sanctions than Professional Skepticism and Substantial Procedures. Among accounting standards, Fair Value misstatements are associated with more severe audit sanctions than Long-term investment, bank debts, and liquidity errors, and with lower severity of audit sanctions than Account receivables. Taken together, these findings suggest two main determinants of audit sanctions severity that auditors and accountants need to be aware: the area of internal control deficiencies and the area of fair value measurement. From these results, we learn that accounting and auditing standards errors have different likelihood of audit sanctions, and that auditors that aim to avoid sanctions need to invest mainly in the internal control assurance and in the fair value items of the financial reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Azzali & Tatiana Mazza, 2020. "Determinants of Audit Sanctions Severity," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 28-38, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:28-38
    DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v11n2p28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/17232/10846
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/17232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijba.v11n2p28?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suraj Srinivasan, 2005. "Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee Members," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 291-334, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adi Masli & Matthew G. Sherwood & Rajendra P. Srivastava, 2018. "Attributes and Structure of an Effective Board of Directors: A Theoretical Investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 485-523, December.
    2. Zhu Xiuli & Hu Dan Semba & Fang Fang, 2025. "Influence of company secretary characteristics on information disclosure violations: evidence from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 791-806, September.
    3. Rüdiger Fahlenbrach & Angie Low & René M. Stulz, 2010. "The Dark Side of Outside Directors: Do they Quit When They are Most Needed?," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 10-17, Swiss Finance Institute.
    4. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    5. Zvi Singer & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Do companies try to conceal financial misstatements through auditor shopping?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 140-180, January.
    6. Jolien Roelandt & Petra Andries & Mirjam Knockaert, 2022. "The contribution of board experience to opportunity development in high-tech ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1627-1645, March.
    7. Kai Wai Hui & Clive Lennox & Guochang Zhang, 2014. "The Market's Valuation of Fraudulently Reported Earnings," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5-6), pages 627-651, June.
    8. Sofia Larmou & Nikos Vafeas, 2010. "The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 61-85, February.
    9. Martin J. Conyon & Lerong He, 2016. "Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 669-691, April.
    10. Badolato, Patrick G. & Donelson, Dain C. & Ege, Matthew, 2014. "Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 208-230.
    11. Marc Berninger, 2024. "Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 613-639, December.
    12. Janne Chung & Susan McCracken, 2014. "Understanding the Restatement Process," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 253-281, December.
    13. Phillip T. Lamoreaux & Summer Zhujun Liu & Nathan J. Newton & Min Zhang, 2026. "Auditor-provided nonpublic signals of misreporting and CFO dismissal," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 489-525, March.
    14. Shivdasani, Anil & Song, Wei-Ling, 2010. "Breaking Down the Barriers: Competition, Syndicate Structure, and Underwriting Incentives," Working Papers 10-25, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    15. Unsal, Omer & Hippler, William J., 2024. "Corporate misconduct and innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Jean Bédard & Suzanne M. Paquette, 2021. "Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Litigation Risk, and Auditor‐Provided Tax Services†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 7-48, March.
    17. Ray Ball, 2009. "Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(2), pages 277-323, May.
    18. Mohammed Alshetwi, 2016. "The Association between Audit Committee Members’ Multiple Directorship, Ownership and Earnings Management in Saudi Arabia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(10), pages 33-45, October.
    19. Brochet, Francois & Srinivasan, Suraj, 2014. "Accountability of independent directors: Evidence from firms subject to securities litigation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 430-449.
    20. Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, 2018. "How Common Are Intentional GAAP Violations? Estimates from a Dynamic Model," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(1), pages 5-44, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:28-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.