IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v10y2021i2p70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Audit Committee Characteristics Promote Risk Management Practices in Nigerian Listed Firms?

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen A. Ojeka
  • Alex Adeboye
  • Olajide Dahunsi

Abstract

There has been a huge and deluge of risk threatening industries at an unequalled magnitude in recent times. As such, the board of directors and senior executives are increasingly expected to manage their various organizations' risk portfolios, affecting their financial performance. This has led to the assigning of the risk assessment role to the audit committee. The board of directors and its audit committee play an essential function in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) by building up the right condition or tone-at-the-top. Given the board's responsibilities for representing the interests of shareholders, it plays a vital role in overseeing management's approach to ERM. This study examined the relationship between audit committee characteristics and risk management of some selected listed firms in a developing country like Nigeria. The study used secondary data to describe the dependent variable (financial risk decomposed into credit risk and liquidity risk) and the explanatory variables (decomposed into audit committee accounting expertise, audit committee meetings, audit committee independence and audit committee gender). The study used pair sample t-test, student t-test, Pearson Moment Correlation and random panel data estimator for twenty (20) selected listed firms for 2012-2016. Findings indicate that there is a negative between audit committee accounting expertise and financial risk. This revealed that Accounting Expertise in Audit Committees are likely to involve in activities and practices to curb financial risk. In addition, the Audit committee meeting indicates a negative relationship with credit risk. Audit committee gender and audit committee independence have a negative effect on liquidity risk. Therefore, this study recommends that Audit committees embrace Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to manage risks effectively across the organization. Risk management processes should be one of the major points of discussion during audit committee meetings.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A. Ojeka & Alex Adeboye & Olajide Dahunsi, 2021. "Does Audit Committee Characteristics Promote Risk Management Practices in Nigerian Listed Firms?," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-70, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/20570/12653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/20570
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Mohammed Alzharani & Abdullah Mohammed Alzharani, 2015. "An Empirical Investigation Of Audit Committee Effectiveness And Risk Management: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 39-49.
    2. Zi-Yi Guo, 2017. "Heavy-tailed Distributions and Risk Management of Equity Market Tail Events," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 31-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Umar Habibu Umar & Muhamad Abduh & Mohd Hairul Azrin Besar, 2023. "Standalone risk management committee, risk governance diversity and Islamic bank risk-taking," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Benedict Valentine Arulanandam & Christo Selvan & Goh Xin Tong, 2023. "Critical Factors Influencing Firms' Risk-Taking Behaviour: CEO Characteristics and the Moderating Role of the Audit Committee," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 1-41.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Fei & Kang, Hao & Xu, Jingfeng, 2022. "Financial stability and network complexity: A random matrix approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 177-185.
    2. Adrian Quintero & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke, 2024. "Bayesian Exploratory Factor Analysis via Gibbs Sampling," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(1), pages 121-142, February.
    3. B Rajesh Kumar & Manuel Fernandez, 2019. "Examination of Index Model and Prediction of Beta –A Case Study Examination in IT Sector," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(2), pages 226-226, May.
    4. Jianhua Ding & Turen Guo & Bin Guo, 2018. "Fat Tails, Value at Risk, and the Palladium Returns," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 7(2), pages 95-103, May.
    5. Naeem, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Saleem, Kashif & Mustafa, Faisal, 2019. "Risk analysis of high frequency precious metals returns by using long memory model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 399-409.
    6. Osman Nal & Andrew Cai, 2020. "Analyzing Impact of a Crisis on Bank Financial Ratios," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Olusola David Fajembola & Nora Azureen Abdul Rahman & Rohani Md-Rus, 2018. "Audit Committee and Banking System Stability: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(6), pages 463-474, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.