IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.53year2019issue3pp155-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Economic Freedom Matter For CO2 Emissions? Lessons From Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kolade Sunday Adesina
  • John W. Muteba Mwamba

    (University of Johannesburg, South Africa
    Yaba College of Technology, Nigeria
    University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

The increase in the concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere has become one of the major issues worldwide. This increase has also drawn the attention of many financial and economic researchers to empirically investigate the determinants of CO2 emissions and environmental quality. However, many studies ignore the influence of economic freedom when investigating the determinants. This gap in the literature has motivated this study to examine the environmental impacts of economic freedom and whether these effects differ across various income groups. This study also offers what we know as the first study on the effect of unemployment rate on environmental quality. In order to strengthen the explanatory power of the estimation results, we employ electricity power consumption and GDP per capita as our control variables. Using the system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator with a panel dataset for 24 African countries over 1995 – 2013 period, our results show that increases in economic freedom, proxied by trade freedom index, business freedom index, freedom from corruption and fiscal freedom index, increase environmental quality, measured using CO2 emissions. Our finding that fiscal freedom exerts a negative effect on CO2 emissions remained unchanged with the sample split into different income groups (low income, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries). This suggests that tax reduction policies can be implemented to reduce CO2 emissions. At the same time, our further analyses, which are based on the different income groups, show that the effects of business freedom, freedom from corruption, and trade freedom on CO2 emissions differ across the various income groups. Specifically, the results indicate significant negative impacts of freedom from corruption and business freedom on CO2 emissions only for upper-middle income countries, while trade freedom is significantly negative only for lower-middle income countries, implying that the impacts of the variables depend on the income levels of the countries. The results also show that unemployment rate has no significant negative effect on CO2 emissions in lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, yet it significantly reduces CO2 emissions in low income countries. Thus, in order to have a robust understanding of the effects of economic freedom and unemployment rate on CO2 emissions, it is important to use a panel of more homogeneous economies. Our findings suggest that country-specific (or country-income based) environmental policies should be encouraged in order is to win the war against CO2 emissions and by extension environmental degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kolade Sunday Adesina & John W. Muteba Mwamba, 2019. "Does Economic Freedom Matter For CO2 Emissions? Lessons From Africa," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 53(3), pages 155-167, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:155-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/715375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simionescu, Mihaela & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Sustainability policies to reduce pollution in energy supply and waste sectors in the V4 countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Gamze Sart & Yilmaz Bayar & Marina Danilina & Funda Hatice Sezgin, 2022. "Economic Freedom, Education and CO 2 Emissions: A Causality Analysis for EU Member States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Wencong, Lu & Kasimov, Ikboljon & Saydaliev, Hayot Berk, 2023. "Foreign direct investment and renewable energy: Examining the environmental Kuznets curve in resource-rich transition economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 301-310.
    4. Urszula Gierałtowska & Roman Asyngier & Joanna Nakonieczny & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2022. "Renewable Energy, Urbanization, and CO 2 Emissions: A Global Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Bjørnskov, Christian, 2020. "Economic Freedom and the CO2 Kuznets Curve," Working Paper Series 1331, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    6. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "Unveiling the Role of Business Freedom to Determine Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 157-164, September.
    7. Isaac K. Ofori & Francesco Figari & Nathanael Ojong, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 23/023, African Governance and Development Institute..
    8. Mirziyoyeva, Ziroat & Salahodjaev, Raufhon, 2022. "Renewable energy and CO2 emissions intensity in the top carbon intense countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 507-512.
    9. Ofori, Isaac K. & Figari, Francesco & Ojong, Nathanael, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," MPRA Paper 116956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Isaac K. Ofori & Francesco Figari & Nathanael Ojong, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," Working Papers 23/023, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    C02 Emissions; Economic Freedom; Economic Condition; Electricity Consumption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue3:pp:155-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.