IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.52year2018issue3pp1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributional Effects of Agricultural Infrastructure in Developing Countries: Large Irrigation Dams and Drought Mitigation in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroyuki Takeshima

    (International Food Policy Research Institute, USA)

Abstract

Despite the past investments and continued interests in public infrastructure like large irrigation dams, there has been limited evidence for their effects on household level consumptions and agricultural production, and how these effects are spatially distributed, depending on the locations of households in relations to the dams. Using a panel household survey, information of the locations of large irrigation dams, drainage basins, and drought index, we assess how large irrigation dams benefit households' consumptions and agricultural production, mitigate the effects of drought, and how these effects are distributed across drainage basins in Nigeria. We classify households into dam-basins (basins that contain large irrigation dams), downstream basins (those located downstream of dams), and other non-dam basins. Multinomial inverse-probability weighting method, combined with difference-in-difference methods, construct appropriate counterfactual samples, through which the effects of large irrigation dams and their variations across drainage basins are identified. We find that large irrigation dams largely benefit the downstream basins, rather than dam-basins or other basins. Households in downstream basins, for whom suitable matches can be found in other types of basins, are less affected by the drought and enjoy relatively stable growth rates of real per capita income and food consumption, compared to what they would experience if they were in other types of basins. Such relative stability in incomes and food consumption in downstream basins, despite the droughts, are partly due to the stable food production that is enabled by the supply of irrigation waters from the dams in the event of drought. These findings are robust against the effects of drought on water supply to the dams, proxy of state level political factors, and drought timing. The findings have important policy implications. Drainage basins have only been recently estimated relatively accurately in countries like Nigeria, while most irrigation dams in Nigeria had already been built by the 1990s. Locations of the new construction or rehabilitation of irrigation dams in Nigeria should carefully consider not only the agroecological and socioeconomic conditions, and weather-risks like droughts in the drainage basins where dams are located, but also these conditions of downstream drainage basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroyuki Takeshima, 2018. "Distributional Effects of Agricultural Infrastructure in Developing Countries: Large Irrigation Dams and Drought Mitigation in Nigeria," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(3), pages 1-13, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue3:pp:1-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/677929
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jordan, Cristian & Donoso, Guillermo & Speelman, Stijn, 2021. "Measuring the effect of improved irrigation technologies on irrigated agriculture. A study case in Central Chile," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Irrigation Dam; Drainage Basin; Drought; Multinomial Logit; Inverse Probability Weighting; Nigeria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.52:year:2018:issue3:pp:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.