IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v42y2008i4p514-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Network Flow Effects into the Airline Fleet Assignment Process

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy L. Jacobs

    (Operations Research and Decision Support, American Airlines, Fort Worth, Texas 76155)

  • Barry C. Smith

    (Sabre Holdings, Southlake, Texas 76092)

  • Ellis L. Johnson

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

This paper presents a new methodology for incorporating origin and destination (O&D) network effects into the fleet assignment process. The methodology uses a decomposition strategy to combine a modified version of a leg-based fleet assignment model (Leg-FAM) with the network flow aspects of probabilistic O&D yield management. By decomposing the problem, the nonlinear aspects of the O&D market effects and passenger flow are isolated in O&D yield management and incorporated in FAM using linear approximations to the total network revenue function. To illustrate this methodology and its economic benefits, an example consisting of 10 cities, 48 flight legs, and 534 O&D market classes is presented and compared to the results found using two commonly used Leg-FAM formulations. To benchmark the benefits of using an O&D approach to fleet assignment, we present two case studies comparing the Leg-FAM and O&D FAM approaches using actual airline schedules with more than 4,000 daily operations. For these benchmarks, we present the results of a general fleet assignment process in which all the scheduled flights must be assigned an aircraft type and a schedule reduction run in which nonprofitable flights can be cancelled. The methodology presented in this paper is ideally suited for demand-driven dispatch (D 3 ) scenarios, where near-term fleeting changes are made to better match O&D passenger demand to available aircraft capacity. To illustrate the use of the O&D FAM methodology to facilitate near-term refleeting process, we present results from implementing a D 3 process using O&D FAM at AMR's American Eagle Airlines.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy L. Jacobs & Barry C. Smith & Ellis L. Johnson, 2008. "Incorporating Network Flow Effects into the Airline Fleet Assignment Process," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 514-529, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:42:y:2008:i:4:p:514-529
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1080.0242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1080.0242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.1080.0242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew E. Berge & Craig A. Hopperstad, 1993. "Demand Driven Dispatch: A Method for Dynamic Aircraft Capacity Assignment, Models and Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 153-168, February.
    2. Jeph Abara, 1989. "Applying Integer Linear Programming to the Fleet Assignment Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 20-28, August.
    3. Barry C. Smith & Ellis L. Johnson, 2006. "Robust Airline Fleet Assignment: Imposing Station Purity Using Station Decomposition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 497-516, November.
    4. Radhika Subramanian & Richard P. Scheff & John D. Quillinan & D. Steve Wiper & Roy E. Marsten, 1994. "Coldstart: Fleet Assignment at Delta Air Lines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 104-120, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Cadarso & Vikrant Vaze & Cynthia Barnhart & Ángel Marín, 2017. "Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition Effects and the Entry of the High Speed Rail," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 132-154, February.
    2. Pandit, Partha Kumar & Akhtar Hasin, M. Ahsan, 2018. "Business model of aircraft fleet planning using ANN," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), The Road to a Digitalized Supply Chain Management: Smart and Digital Solutions for Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International C, volume 25, pages 221-247, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Keji Wei & Vikrant Vaze, 2020. "Airline Timetable Development and Fleet Assignment Incorporating Passenger Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 139-163, January.
    4. Ma, Qiuzhuo & Song, Haiqing & Zhu, Wenbin, 2018. "Low-carbon airline fleet assignment: A compromise approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 86-102.
    5. Oliver Faust & Jochen Gönsch & Robert Klein, 2017. "Demand-Oriented Integrated Scheduling for Point-to-Point Airlines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 196-213, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barry C. Smith & Ellis L. Johnson, 2006. "Robust Airline Fleet Assignment: Imposing Station Purity Using Station Decomposition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 497-516, November.
    2. Okan Örsan Özener & Melda Örmeci Matoğlu & Güneş Erdoğan & Mohamed Haouari & Hasan Sözer, 2017. "Solving a large-scale integrated fleet assignment and crew pairing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 477-500, June.
    3. Ovidiu Listes & Rommert Dekker, 2005. "A Scenario Aggregation–Based Approach for Determining a Robust Airline Fleet Composition for Dynamic Capacity Allocation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 367-382, August.
    4. Hanif D. Sherali & Xiaomei Zhu, 2008. "Two-Stage Fleet Assignment Model Considering Stochastic Passenger Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 383-399, April.
    5. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Jon Goodstein & Amit Mukherjee & James B. Orlin & Dushyant Sharma, 2007. "A Very Large-Scale Neighborhood Search Algorithm for the Combined Through-Fleet-Assignment Model," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 416-428, August.
    6. Brian Rexing & Cynthia Barnhart & Tim Kniker & Ahmad Jarrah & Nirup Krishnamurthy, 2000. "Airline Fleet Assignment with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Azadian, Farshid, 2023. "The airline seat capacity allocation problem: An expected marginal profit approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Hanif D. Sherali & Ebru K. Bish & Xiaomei Zhu, 2005. "Polyhedral Analysis and Algorithms for a Demand-Driven Refleeting Model for Aircraft Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 349-366, August.
    9. Saravanan Venkatachalam & Suresh Acharya & Kenji Oba & Yoshinari Nakayama, 2020. "Prescriptive Analytics for Swapping Aircraft Assignments at All Nippon Airways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 99-111, March.
    10. Ahmad I. Jarrah & Jon Goodstein & Ram Narasimhan, 2000. "An Efficient Airline Re-Fleeting Model for the Incremental Modification of Planned Fleet Assignments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 349-363, November.
    11. Hanif D. Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2010. "Integrated Airline Schedule Design and Fleet Assignment: Polyhedral Analysis and Benders' Decomposition Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 500-513, November.
    12. João P. Pita & Cynthia Barnhart & António P. Antunes, 2013. "Integrated Flight Scheduling and Fleet Assignment Under Airport Congestion," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 477-492, November.
    13. Belanger, Nicolas & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, Francois & Desrosiers, Jacques, 2006. "Periodic airline fleet assignment with time windows, spacing constraints, and time dependent revenues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1754-1766, December.
    14. Listes, O.L. & Dekker, R., 2002. "A scenario aggregation based approach for determining a robust airline fleet composition," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-17, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Pita, João Pedro & Antunes, António Pais & Barnhart, Cynthia & de Menezes, António Gomes, 2013. "Setting public service obligations in low-demand air transportation networks: Application to the Azores," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 35-48.
    16. Cynthia Barnhart & Timothy S. Kniker & Manoj Lohatepanont, 2002. "Itinerary-Based Airline Fleet Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 199-217, May.
    17. Hanif Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "A benders decomposition approach for an integrated airline schedule design and fleet assignment problem with flight retiming, schedule balance, and demand recapture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 213-244, November.
    18. Sherali, Hanif D. & Bish, Ebru K. & Zhu, Xiaomei, 2006. "Airline fleet assignment concepts, models, and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Sarac, Abdulkadir & Batta, Rajan & Rump, Christopher M., 2006. "A branch-and-price approach for operational aircraft maintenance routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1850-1869, December.
    20. Bélanger, Nicolas & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François & Desrosiers, Jacques & Lavigne, June, 2006. "Weekly airline fleet assignment with homogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 306-318, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:42:y:2008:i:4:p:514-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.