IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External Interfaces or Internal Processes? Market Positioning and Divergent Professionalization Paths in Young Ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia DeSantola

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Ranjay Gulati

    (Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Pavel I. Zhelyazkov

    (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

We explore how the initial market positioning of entrepreneurial ventures shapes how they professionalize over time, focusing specifically on the development of functional roles. In contrast to existing literature, which presumes a uniform march toward professionalization as ventures scale and complete developmental milestones, we advance a contingent perspective, distinguishing between the development of external interface functions (marketing & sales and customer development) and internal process functions (accounting, human resources, and finance). Specifically, we argue that positioning in an unconventional market space raises demand for external engagement that focuses ventures’ attention and resources toward developing external interface roles. At the same time, such unconventional ventures are less apt to elaborate their internal process roles relative to more conventional peers. We test these predictions using a novel longitudinal data set on the internal organizations of 3,748 U.S.-based entrepreneurial ventures. In contrast to common assumptions of convergent professionalization, our theory and findings advance the perspective that ventures pursue divergent professionalization paths based on their initial market positioning as they scale up.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia DeSantola & Ranjay Gulati & Pavel I. Zhelyazkov, 2023. "External Interfaces or Internal Processes? Market Positioning and Divergent Professionalization Paths in Young Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1561
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.