IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v27y2016i5p1084-1107.html

Occupational Survival Through Field-Level Task Integration: Systems Men, Production Planners, and the Computer, 1940s–1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Steven J. Kahl

    (Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755)

  • Brayden G. King

    (Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Greg Liegel

    (ChoreHat, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

This paper examines how occupational groups survive the introduction of a new technology and associated jurisdictional changes. We draw on a comparative historical analysis of two occupational associations’—systems men and production planners—efforts to frame their evolving tasks and relate to other occupations after the introduction of the computer into U.S. business in the early 1950s. We observe that systems men followed the path traditionally advocated in the occupations and professions literature by seeking autonomy through differentiating their task domains from other groups and by trying to get other groups to recognize their control. But they were unsuccessful and disbanded by the mid-1990s. In contrast, the successful production planners took an integrative approach through efforts to frame the interdependencies of their tasks and relate to other occupations, making them more necessary to the functioning of other groups and the organization. Our study contributes to the growing relational perspective on occupations by showing how taking an integrative approach with other occupations at the field level can help occupations survive long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven J. Kahl & Brayden G. King & Greg Liegel, 2016. "Occupational Survival Through Field-Level Task Integration: Systems Men, Production Planners, and the Computer, 1940s–1990s," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1084-1107, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1084-1107
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2016.1087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa E. Cohen, 2013. "Assembling Jobs: A Model of How Tasks Are Bundled Into and Across Jobs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 432-454, April.
    2. Sharique Hasan & John-Paul Ferguson & Rembrand Koning, 2015. "The Lives and Deaths of Jobs: Technical Interdependence and Survival in a Job Structure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1665-1681, December.
    3. Ruthanne Huising & Susan S. Silbey, 2011. "Governing the gap : Forging safe science through relational regulation," Post-Print hal-02311930, HAL.
    4. Ruthanne Huising, 2015. "To Hive or to Hold? : Professional Authority through Scut Work," Post-Print hal-02311917, HAL.
    5. Namrata Malhotra & Timothy Morris, 2009. "Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 895-922, September.
    6. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    7. Anteby, Michel & Chan, Curtis K. & DiBenigno, Julia, "undated". "Three Lenses on Occupations and Professions in Organizations: Becoming, Doing, and Relating," Working Paper 324041, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    8. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Post-Print hal-02311927, HAL.
    9. Lipsky, Michael, 1968. "Protest as a Political Resource," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 1144-1158, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Beane & Callen Anthony, 2024. "Inverted Apprenticeship: How Senior Occupational Members Develop Practical Expertise and Preserve Their Position When New Technologies Arrive," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 405-431, March.
    2. Jillian Chown, 2020. "Financial Incentives and Professionals’ Work Tasks: The Moderating Effects of Jurisdictional Dominance and Prominence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 887-908, July.
    3. Roman V. Galperin, 2020. "Organizational Powers: Contested Innovation and Loss of Professional Jurisdiction in the Case of Retail Medicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 508-534, March.
    4. Grace Augustine, 2021. "We’re Not Like Those Crazy Hippies: The Dynamics of Jurisdictional Drift in Externally Mandated Occupational Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1056-1078, July.
    5. Kurt Sandholtz & Daisy Chung & Isaac Waisberg, 2019. "The Double-Edged Sword of Jurisdictional Entrenchment: Explaining Human Resources Professionals’ Failed Strategic Repositioning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1349-1367, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jillian Chown, 2020. "Financial Incentives and Professionals’ Work Tasks: The Moderating Effects of Jurisdictional Dominance and Prominence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 887-908, July.
    2. Kurt Sandholtz & Daisy Chung & Isaac Waisberg, 2019. "The Double-Edged Sword of Jurisdictional Entrenchment: Explaining Human Resources Professionals’ Failed Strategic Repositioning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1349-1367, November.
    3. Matthew Beane & Callen Anthony, 2024. "Inverted Apprenticeship: How Senior Occupational Members Develop Practical Expertise and Preserve Their Position When New Technologies Arrive," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 405-431, March.
    4. Ruthanne Huising & Susan S. Silbey, 2021. "Accountability infrastructures: Pragmatic compliance inside organizations," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 40-62, November.
    5. Aruna Ranganathan, 2023. "When the Tasks Line Up: How the Nature of Supplementary Tasks Affects Worker Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 556-585, May.
    6. Lisa E. Cohen & Sara Mahabadi, 2022. "In the Midst of Hiring: Pathways of Anticipated and Accidental Job Evolution During Hiring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 1938-1963, September.
    7. Roman V. Galperin, 2020. "Organizational Powers: Contested Innovation and Loss of Professional Jurisdiction in the Case of Retail Medicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 508-534, March.
    8. Joelle Evans & Susan S. Silbey, 2022. "Co-Opting Regulation: Professional Control Through Discretionary Mobilization of Legal Prescriptions and Expert Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 2041-2064, September.
    9. Hatim A. Rahman & Melissa A. Valentine, 2021. "How Managers Maintain Control Through Collaborative Repair: Evidence from Platform-Mediated “Gigs”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 1300-1326, September.
    10. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    11. Summer Rachel Jackson & Katherine Cissel Kellogg, 2023. "Triadic Advocacy Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 456-483, January.
    12. Afshin Omidi & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2022. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. April L. Wright & Gemma Irving & Asma Zafar & Trish Reay, 2023. "The Role of Space and Place in Organizational and Institutional Change: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 991-1026, June.
    14. James Feigenbaum & Daniel P. Gross, 2024. "Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8520-8540, December.
    15. Omidi, Afshin & Dal Zotto, Cinzia & Gandini, Alessandro, 2023. "Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 899-913.
    16. Insiya Hussain & Marko Pitesa & Stefan Thau & Michael Schaerer, 2024. "Pay Suppression in Social Impact Contexts: How Framing Work Around the Greater Good Inhibits Job Candidate Compensation Demands," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 525-549, March.
    17. Sharique Hasan & John-Paul Ferguson & Rembrand Koning, 2015. "The Lives and Deaths of Jobs: Technical Interdependence and Survival in a Job Structure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1665-1681, December.
    18. Grace Augustine, 2021. "We’re Not Like Those Crazy Hippies: The Dynamics of Jurisdictional Drift in Externally Mandated Occupational Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1056-1078, July.
    19. Thomas John Fewer & Dali Ma & Diego M. Coraiola, 2025. "Working with the “Enemy”: Supervised Space, Free Space, and Cross-Border Collaboration amid Geopolitical Rivalry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1909-1938, September.
    20. Matthew Bidwell & J. R. Keller, 2025. "Stepping Sideways to Step up: Lateral Mobility and Career Advancement Inside Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 240-261, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1084-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.