IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v59y2011i2p455-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis of Queueing Networks via Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Bertsimas

    (Operations Research Center and Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • David Gamarnik

    (Operations Research Center and Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Alexander Anatoliy Rikun

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

Performance analysis of queueing networks is one of the most challenging areas of queueing theory. Barring very specialized models such as product-form type queueing networks, there exist very few results that provide provable nonasymptotic upper and lower bounds on key performance measures.In this paper we propose a new performance analysis method, which is based on the robust optimization. The basic premise of our approach is as follows: rather than assuming that the stochastic primitives of a queueing model satisfy certain probability laws---such as i.i.d. interarrival and service times distributions---we assume that the underlying primitives are deterministic and satisfy the implications of such probability laws. These implications take the form of simple linear constraints, namely, those motivated by the law of the iterated logarithm (LIL). Using this approach we are able to obtain performance bounds on some key performance measures. Furthermore, these performance bounds imply similar bounds in the underlying stochastic queueing models.We demonstrate our approach on two types of queueing networks: (a) tandem single-class queueing network and (b) multiclass single-server queueing network. In both cases, using the proposed robust optimization approach, we are able to obtain explicit upper bounds on some steady-state performance measures. For example, for the case of TSC system we obtain a bound of the form C (1 - (rho)) -1 ln ln((1 - (rho)) -1 ) on the expected steady-state sojourn time, where C is an explicit constant and (rho) is the bottleneck traffic intensity. This qualitatively agrees with the correct heavy traffic scaling of this performance measure up to the ln ln((1 - (rho)) -1 ) correction factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Bertsimas & David Gamarnik & Alexander Anatoliy Rikun, 2011. "Performance Analysis of Queueing Networks via Robust Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 455-466, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:455-466
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1100.0879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0879
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1100.0879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Dimitris Bertsimas & José Niño-Mora, 1999. "Optimization of Multiclass Queueing Networks with Changeover Times Via the Achievable Region Approach: Part I, The Single-Station Case," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 306-330, May.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & José Niño-Mora, 1999. "Optimization of Multiclass Queueing Networks with Changeover Times Via the Achievable Region Approach: Part II, The Multi-Station Case," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 331-361, May.
    4. J. R. Morrison & P. R. Kumar, 1999. "New Linear Program Performance Bounds for Queueing Networks," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 575-597, March.
    5. Martin I. Reiman, 1984. "Open Queueing Networks in Heavy Traffic," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 441-458, August.
    6. H. Jin & J. Ou & P. R. Kumar, 1997. "The Throughput of Irreducible Closed Markovian Queueing Networks: Functional Bounds, Asymptotic Loss, Efficiency, and the Harrison-Wein Conjectures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 886-920, November.
    7. J. G. Dai & Thomas G. Kurtz, 1995. "A multiclass Station with Markovian Feedback in Heavy Traffic," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 721-742, August.
    8. A. L. Soyster, 1973. "Technical Note—Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1154-1157, October.
    9. A. Ben-Tal & A. Nemirovski, 1998. "Robust Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 769-805, November.
    10. Sigman, Karl, 1990. "The stability of open queueing networks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 11-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeynep Turgay & Fikri Karaesmen & Egemen Lerzan Örmeci, 2018. "Structural properties of a class of robust inventory and queueing control problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 699-716, December.
    2. Bren, Austin & Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Data-Driven Percentile Optimization for Multi-Class Queueing Systems with Model Ambiguity: Theory and Application," Working Paper Series rwp18-008, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    4. Schönlein, Michael & Makuschewitz, Thomas & Wirth, Fabian & Scholz-Reiter, Bernd, 2013. "Measurement and optimization of robust stability of multiclass queueing networks: Applications in dynamic supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 179-189.
    5. Itai Gurvich & John J. Hasenbein, 2022. "Policy robustness in queueing networks," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 425-427, April.
    6. Chaithanya Bandi & Dimitris Bertsimas & Nataly Youssef, 2018. "Robust transient analysis of multi-server queueing systems and feed-forward networks," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 351-413, August.
    7. Shuangchi He & Melvyn Sim & Meilin Zhang, 2019. "Data-Driven Patient Scheduling in Emergency Departments: A Hybrid Robust-Stochastic Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4123-4140, September.
    8. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    2. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    3. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    4. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    5. Xuejie Bai & Yankui Liu, 2016. "Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1131-1149, December.
    6. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    7. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    8. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    9. Roberto Gomes de Mattos & Fabricio Oliveira & Adriana Leiras & Abdon Baptista de Paula Filho & Paulo Gonçalves, 2019. "Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1045-1078, December.
    10. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    11. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    12. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    13. Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Sebastian Stiller & Paolo Toth, 2014. "Delay-Robust Event Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 274-283, April.
    14. Steffen Rebennack, 2022. "Data-driven stochastic optimization for distributional ambiguity with integrated confidence region," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 255-293, October.
    15. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2016. "The Impact of Modeling on Robust Inventory Management Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1188-1201, April.
    16. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Xiong, 2020. "Robust Stochastic Optimization Made Easy with RSOME," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3329-3339, August.
    18. Donya Rahmani & Arash Zandi & Sara Behdad & Arezou Entezaminia, 2021. "A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 273-297, March.
    19. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.
    20. Fang Xu & Mengfan Yan & Lun Wang & Shaojian Qu, 2022. "The Robust Emergency Medical Facilities Location-Allocation Models under Uncertain Environment: A Hybrid Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:455-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.