IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v59y2011i2p440-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Impact of Layout on Productivity: An Analysis from Robotic-Cell Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Tharanga Rajapakshe

    (School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083)

  • Milind Dawande

    (School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083)

  • Chelliah Sriskandarajah

    (School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083)

Abstract

Although the impact of layout on the productivity of manufacturing systems is well recognized, a quantification of this impact is an issue that is often ignored or crudely approximated in practice. When evaluating competing layouts for a manufacturing system, the trade-off between their relative benefits and their relative costs underlines the need for a reasonably accurate comparison of the productivity offered by these potential layouts. In this paper, we argue for this approach by comparing the productivity of two well-known layouts in robotic-cell manufacturing: circular and linear.We consider the problem of optimizing throughput in single-gripper, bufferless robotic cells that produce identical parts under the free-pickup criterion and the additive-travel-time metric. For cells with a circular layout, we show that the problem of finding an optimal 1-unit cycle is NP-hard. Our main algorithmic result is a polynomial-time 5/3-approximation algorithm for this problem. We then demonstrate that our algorithm provides near-optimal solutions by compiling its performance on an extensive test bed of practically-relevant instances. Finally, we use the algorithm to assess the increase in throughput for cells with a circular layout over those with a linear layout. We show that a circular layout offers a significant improvement in productivity and demonstrate the robustness of this improvement by examining the sensitivity with respect to changes in the design parameters of the robotic cell. Thus, our work provides operations managers with a tool to trade off the resulting increase in revenue with the additional cost of acquiring and maintaining a robot that can exploit a circular layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Tharanga Rajapakshe & Milind Dawande & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2011. "Quantifying the Impact of Layout on Productivity: An Analysis from Robotic-Cell Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 440-454, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:440-454
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1100.0874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0874
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1100.0874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Inna Drobouchevitch & Suresh P. Sethi & Ramaswamy Chandrasekaran, 2004. "Scheduling Multiple Parts in a Robotic Cell Served by a Dual-Gripper Robot," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 65-82, February.
    2. Garg, Suresh & Vrat, Prem & Kanda, Arun, 2001. "Equipment flexibility vs. inventory: A simulation study of manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 125-143, March.
    3. Sunderesh S. Heragu & Andrew Kusiak, 1988. "Machine Layout Problem in Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 258-268, April.
    4. Yavuz A. Bozer & Russell D. Meller & Steven J. Erlebacher, 1994. "An Improvement-Type Layout Algorithm for Single and Multiple-Floor Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(7), pages 918-932, July.
    5. Milind Dawande & Michael Pinedo & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2009. "Multiple Part-Type Production in Robotic Cells: Equivalence of Two Real-World Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 210-228, February.
    6. Y. Crama & V. Kats & J. van de Klundert & E. Levner, 2000. "Cyclic scheduling in robotic flowshops," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 97-124, November.
    7. Janny M. Y. Leung & Guoqing Zhang & Xiaoguang Yang & Raymond Mak & Kokin Lam, 2004. "Optimal Cyclic Multi-Hoist Scheduling: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 965-976, December.
    8. Yang, Taho & Peters, Brett A. & Tu, Mingan, 2005. "Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 440-455, July.
    9. Bock, Stefan & Hoberg, Kai, 2007. "Detailed layout planning for irregularly-shaped machines with transportation path design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 693-718, March.
    10. F. Robert Jacobs, 1987. "A Layout Planning System with Multiple Criteria and a Variable Domain Representation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(8), pages 1020-1034, August.
    11. Levner, Eugene & Kats, Vladimir & Levit, Vadim E., 1997. "An improved algorithm for cyclic flowshop scheduling in a robotic cell," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 500-508, March.
    12. John S. Morris & Richard J. Tersine, 1990. "A Simulation Analysis of Factors Influencing the Attractiveness of Group Technology Cellular Layouts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1567-1578, December.
    13. Milind Dawande & H. Geismar & Michael Pinedo & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2010. "Throughput optimization in dual-gripper interval robotic cells," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 1-15.
    14. Yves Crama & Joris van de Klundert, 1997. "Cyclic Scheduling of Identical Parts in a Robotic Cell," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 952-965, December.
    15. Milind Dawande & Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Suresh Sethi, 2002. "On Throughput Maximization in Constant Travel-Time Robotic Cells," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 296-312, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Epping & Hao Zhang, 2018. "A Sustainable Decision-Making Framework for Transitioning to Robotic Welding for Small and Medium Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drobouchevitch, Inna G. & Sethi, Suresh P. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2006. "Scheduling dual gripper robotic cell: One-unit cycles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 598-631, June.
    2. Drobouchevitch, Inna G. & Neil Geismar, H. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2010. "Throughput optimization in robotic cells with input and output machine buffers: A comparative study of two key models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 623-633, November.
    3. Milind Dawande & Michael Pinedo & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2009. "Multiple Part-Type Production in Robotic Cells: Equivalence of Two Real-World Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 210-228, February.
    4. Neil Geismar, H. & Dawande, Milind & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2005. "Approximation algorithms for k-unit cyclic solutions in robotic cells," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 291-309, April.
    5. Che, Ada & Chu, Chengbin, 2009. "Multi-degree cyclic scheduling of a no-wait robotic cell with multiple robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 77-88, November.
    6. Xin Li & Richard Y. K. Fung, 2016. "Optimal K-unit cycle scheduling of two-cluster tools with residency constraints and general robot moving times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 165-176, April.
    7. Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Inna Drobouchevitch & Suresh P. Sethi & Ramaswamy Chandrasekaran, 2004. "Scheduling Multiple Parts in a Robotic Cell Served by a Dual-Gripper Robot," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 65-82, February.
    8. Gultekin, Hakan & Akturk, M. Selim & Karasan, Oya Ekin, 2006. "Cyclic scheduling of a 2-machine robotic cell with tooling constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 777-796, October.
    9. Janny M. Y. Leung & Guoqing Zhang & Xiaoguang Yang & Raymond Mak & Kokin Lam, 2004. "Optimal Cyclic Multi-Hoist Scheduling: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 965-976, December.
    10. Bock, Stefan & Hoberg, Kai, 2007. "Detailed layout planning for irregularly-shaped machines with transportation path design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 693-718, March.
    11. Ghorashi Khalilabadi, S. M. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2022. "A Data-driven Approach to Enhance Worker Productivity by Optimizing Facility Layout," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2022-003-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Che, Ada & Feng, Jianguang & Chen, Haoxun & Chu, Chengbin, 2015. "Robust optimization for the cyclic hoist scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 627-636.
    13. Zhichao Feng & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2021. "On the Capacity of a Process with Batch Processing and Setup Times," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4273-4287, November.
    14. Bagchi, Tapan P. & Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2006. "A review of TSP based approaches for flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 816-854, March.
    15. Yang, Taho & Peters, Brett A. & Tu, Mingan, 2005. "Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 440-455, July.
    16. Ada Che & Vladimir Kats & Eugene Levner, 2011. "Cyclic scheduling in robotic flowshops with bounded work‐in‐process levels," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 1-16, February.
    17. W Zahrouni & H Kamoun, 2011. "Transforming part-sequencing problems in a robotic cell into a GTSP," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 114-123, January.
    18. Imai, Akio & Yamakawa, Yukiko & Huang, Kuancheng, 2014. "The strategic berth template problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-100.
    19. Milind Dawande & Zhichao Feng & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2021. "On the Structure of Bottlenecks in Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3853-3870, June.
    20. Agnetis, A., 2000. "Scheduling no-wait robotic cells with two and three machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 303-314, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:59:y:2011:i:2:p:440-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.