IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p489-507.html

A Markov Decision Model for Managing Display-Advertising Campaigns

Author

Listed:
  • Narendra Agrawal

    (Information Systems & Analytics Department, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

  • Sami Najafi-Asadolahi

    (Information Systems & Analytics Department, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

  • Stephen A. Smith

    (Information Systems & Analytics Department, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California 95053)

Abstract

Problem definition : Managers in ad agencies are responsible for delivering digital ads to viewers on behalf of advertisers, subject to the terms specified in the ad campaigns. They need to develop bidding policies to obtain viewers on an ad exchange and allocate them to the campaigns to maximize the agency’s profits, subject to the goals of the ad campaigns. Academic/practical relevance : Determining a rigorous solution methodology is complicated by uncertainties in the arrival rates of viewers and campaigns, as well as uncertainty in the outcomes of bids on the ad exchange. In practice, ad hoc strategies are often deployed. Our methodology jointly determines optimal bidding and viewer-allocation strategies and obtains insights about the characteristics of the optimal policies. Methodology : New ad campaigns and viewers are treated as Poisson arrivals, and the resulting model is a Markov decision process, where the state of the system is the number of undelivered impressions in queue for each campaign type in each period. We develop solution methods for bid optimization and viewer allocation and perform a sensitivity analysis with respect to the key problem parameters. Results : We solve for the optimal dynamic, state-dependent bidding and allocation policies as a function of the number of ad impressions in queue, for both the finite horizon and steady-state cases. We show that the resulting optimization problems are strictly concave in the decision variables and develop and evaluate a heuristic method that can be applied to large problems. Managerial implications : Numerical analysis of our heuristic solution shows that its errors are generally small and that the optimal dynamic, state-dependent bidding policies obtained by our model are significantly better than optimal static policies. Our proposed approach is managerially attractive because it is easy to implement in practice. We identify the capacity of the impression queue as an important managerial control lever and show that it can be more effective than using higher bids to reduce delay penalties. We quantify potential operational benefits from the consolidation of ad campaigns, as well as merging ad exchanges.

Suggested Citation

  • Narendra Agrawal & Sami Najafi-Asadolahi & Stephen A. Smith, 2023. "A Markov Decision Model for Managing Display-Advertising Campaigns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 489-507, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:489-507
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago R. Balseiro & Jon Feldman & Vahab Mirrokni & S. Muthukrishnan, 2014. "Yield Optimization of Display Advertising with Ad Exchange," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2886-2907, December.
    2. Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2015. "Repeated Auctions with Budgets in Ad Exchanges: Approximations and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 864-884, April.
    3. Radha Mookerjee & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2017. "Optimizing Performance-Based Internet Advertisement Campaigns," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 38-54, February.
    4. Santiago R. Balseiro & Yonatan Gur, 2019. "Learning in Repeated Auctions with Budgets: Regret Minimization and Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 3952-3968, September.
    5. L. Elisa Celis & Gregory Lewis & Markus Mobius & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2014. "Buy-It-Now or Take-a-Chance: Price Discrimination Through Randomized Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2927-2948, December.
    6. Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "Optimal Dynamic Auctions for Display Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 897-913, August.
    7. Ali Hojjat & John Turner & Suleyman Cetintas & Jian Yang, 2017. "A Unified Framework for the Scheduling of Guaranteed Targeted Display Advertising Under Reach and Frequency Requirements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 289-313, April.
    8. Deza, Antoine & Huang, Kai & Metel, Michael R., 2015. "Chance constrained optimization for targeted Internet advertising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 90-96.
    9. Radha Mookerjee & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2017. "Optimizing Performance-Based Internet Advertisement Campaigns," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 38-54, February.
    10. John Turner, 2012. "The Planning of Guaranteed Targeted Display Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 18-33, February.
    11. R. McAfee & Kishore Papineni & Sergei Vassilvitskii, 2013. "Maximally representative allocations for guaranteed delivery advertising campaigns," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(2), pages 83-94, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narendra Agrawal & Sami Najafi-Asadolahi & Stephen A. Smith, 2025. "Dynamic Pricing and Bidding for Display Advertising Campaigns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 843-861, May.
    2. Hana Choi & Carl F. Mela & Santiago R. Balseiro & Adam Leary, 2020. "Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 556-575, June.
    3. Miguel A. Lejeune & John Turner, 2019. "Planning Online Advertising Using Gini Indices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1222-1245, September.
    4. Huaxiao Shen & Yanzhi Li & Youhua (Frank) Chen & Kai Pan, 2021. "Integrated Ad Delivery Planning for Targeted Display Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1409-1429, September.
    5. Anthony Kim & Vahab Mirrokni & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2021. "Deals or No Deals: Contract Design for Online Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1450-1467, September.
    6. Zikun Ye & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Xin Chen & Zhiwei Xu, 2023. "Cold Start to Improve Market Thickness on Online Advertising Platforms: Data-Driven Algorithms and Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3838-3860, July.
    7. Shinjini Pandey & Goutam Dutta & Harit Joshi, 2017. "Survey on Revenue Management in Media and Broadcasting," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 195-213, June.
    8. Abhijeet Ghoshal & Radha Mookerjee & Zhen Sun, 2023. "Serving two masters? Optimizing mobile ad contracts with heterogeneous advertisers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 618-636, February.
    9. Shen, Yuelin, 2018. "Pricing contracts and planning stochastic resources in brand display advertising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 183-194.
    10. Ying-Ju Chen & Guillermo Gallego & Pin Gao & Yang Li, 2025. "Position Auctions with Endogenous Product Information: Why Live-Streaming Advertising Is Thriving," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9290-9307, November.
    11. Huaxiao Shen & Yanzhi Li & Jingjing Guan & Geoffrey K.F. Tso, 2021. "A Planning Approach to Revenue Management for Non‐Guaranteed Targeted Display Advertising," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1583-1602, June.
    12. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Sustaining a Good Impression: Mechanisms for Selling Partitioned Impressions at Ad Exchanges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 126-147, March.
    13. Xiaolong Li & Ying Rong & Renyu Zhang & Huan Zheng, 2025. "Online Advertisement Allocation Under Customer Choices and Algorithmic Fairness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 825-843, January.
    14. Leila Hosseini & Shaojie Tang & Vijay Mookerjee, 2024. "When Is More Merrier? A Cloud-Based Architecture to Procure Impressions from Multiple Ad Exchanges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 294-317, March.
    15. Raghav Singal & Omar Besbes & Antoine Desir & Vineet Goyal & Garud Iyengar, 2022. "Shapley Meets Uniform: An Axiomatic Framework for Attribution in Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7457-7479, October.
    16. Manmohan Aseri & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2018. "Procurement Policies for Mobile-Promotion Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4590-4607, October.
    17. Ying-Ju Chen, 2017. "Optimal Dynamic Auctions for Display Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 897-913, August.
    18. Santiago R. Balseiro & Yonatan Gur, 2019. "Learning in Repeated Auctions with Budgets: Regret Minimization and Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 3952-3968, September.
    19. Bo Chen & Dmitriy Knyazev, 2026. "Optimal Discrimination-Free Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 2267-2283, March.
    20. Radha Mookerjee & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2017. "Optimizing Performance-Based Internet Advertisement Campaigns," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 38-54, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:489-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.