IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v54y2008i3p594-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocation Models and Heuristics for the Outsourcing of Repairs for a Dynamic Warranty Population

Author

Listed:
  • Li Ding

    (Durham Business School, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LB, United Kingdom)

  • Kevin D. Glazebrook

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom)

  • Christopher Kirkbride

    (Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX, United Kingdom)

Abstract

We consider a scenario in which a large equipment manufacturer wishes to outsource the work involved in repairing purchased goods while under warranty. Several external service vendors are available for this work. We develop models and analyses to support decisions concerning how responsibility for the warranty population should be divided between them. These also allow the manufacturer to resolve related questions concerning, for example, whether the service capacities of the contracted vendors are sufficient to deliver an effective post-sales service. Static allocation models yield information concerning the proportions of the warranty population for which the vendors should be responsible overall. Dynamic allocation models enable consideration of how such overall workloads might be delivered to the vendors over time in a way which avoids excessive variability in the repair burden. We apply dynamic programming policy improvement to develop an effective dynamic allocation heuristic. This is evaluated numerically and is also used as a yardstick to assess two simple allocation heuristics suggested by static models. A dynamic greedy allocation heuristic is found to perform well. Dividing the workload equally among vendors with different service capacities can lead to serious losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Ding & Kevin D. Glazebrook & Christopher Kirkbride, 2008. "Allocation Models and Heuristics for the Outsourcing of Repairs for a Dynamic Warranty Population," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 594-607, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:54:y:2008:i:3:p:594-607
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bennett Fox, 1966. "Discrete Optimization Via Marginal Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 210-216, November.
    2. L Ding & K D Glazebrook, 2005. "A static allocation model for the outsourcing of warranty repairs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 825-835, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D Worthington, 2009. "Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 83-92, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ching, Wai Ki, 1997. "Markov-modulated Poisson processes for multi-location inventory problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 217-223, November.
    2. Mustafa Doğru & A. Kok & G. Houtum, 2013. "Newsvendor characterizations for one-warehouse multi-retailer inventory systems with discrete demand under the balance assumption," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 541-559, September.
    3. Xiuli Chao & Liming Liu & Shaohui Zheng, 2003. "Resource Allocation in Multisite Service Systems with Intersite Customer Flows," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1739-1752, December.
    4. Anh Ninh & Benjamin Melamed & Yao Zhao, 2020. "Analysis and optimization of recruitment stocking problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 747-767, December.
    5. Kochel, P., 2007. "Order optimisation in multi-location models with hub-and-spoke structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 368-387, July.
    6. Thomas L. Morin & Roy E. Marsten, 1974. "Brand-and-Bound Strategies for Dynamic Programming," Discussion Papers 106, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    7. Xiaobo Zhao & Fan Fan & Xiaoliang Liu & Jinxing Xie, 2007. "Storage-Space Capacitated Inventory System with ( r, Q ) Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 854-865, October.
    8. Benjaafar, Saifallah, 1995. "Performance bounds for the effectiveness of pooling in multi-processing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 375-388, December.
    9. Yossi Aviv & Awi Federgruen, 2001. "Design for Postponement: A Comprehensive Characterization of Its Benefits Under Unknown Demand Distributions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 578-598, August.
    10. Sridhar Seshadri & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "A componentwise index of service measurement in multi‐component systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 184-194, March.
    11. Feng Cheng* & Markus Ettl & Yingdong Lu & David D. Yao, 2012. "A Production–Inventory Model for a Push–Pull Manufacturing System with Capacity and Service Level Constraints," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 668-681, July.
    12. Sumit Kunnumkal & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2008. "A duality‐based relaxation and decomposition approach for inventory distribution systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 612-631, October.
    13. Özalp Özer, 2003. "Replenishment Strategies for Distribution Systems Under Advance Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 255-272, March.
    14. Frenk, J.B.G. & Labbé, M. & van Vliet, M. & Zhang, S., 1994. "Improved algorithms for machine allocation in manufacturing systems," Econometric Institute Research Papers 11742, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Driessen, M.A. & van Houtum, G.J. & Zijm, W.H.M. & Rustenburg, W.D., 2020. "Capacity assignment in repair shops with high material uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    16. Christiane B. Haubitz & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2021. "How to Change a Running System—Controlling the Transition to Optimized Spare Parts Inventory Policies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1386-1405, May.
    17. Xiao Yu & Armagan Bayram, 2021. "Managing capacity for virtual and office appointments in chronic care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 742-767, December.
    18. Gergely Mincsovics & Nico Dellaert, 2010. "Stochastic dynamic nursing service budgeting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 5-21, July.
    19. D Worthington, 2009. "Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 83-92, May.
    20. Kochel, Peter, 1996. "On queueing models for some multi-location problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 429-433, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:54:y:2008:i:3:p:594-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.