IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v35y1989i7p771-787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Inventory System Costs by Using Robust Demand Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond A. Jacobs

    (Department of Management, Radford University, Radford, Virginia 24142)

  • Harvey M. Wagner

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514)

Abstract

Applications of inventory theory typically use historical data to estimate demand distribution parameters. Imprecise knowledge of the demand distribution adds to the usual replenishment costs associated with stochastic demands. Only limited research has been directed at the problem of choosing cost effective statistical procedures for estimating these parameters. Available theoretical findings on estimating the demand parameters for (s, S) inventory replenishment policies are limited by their restrictive assumptions. The impact on total system cost of using the sample mean and standard deviation as compared to robust parameter estimators has not been tested. This paper explores the circumstances under which the cost due to statistical estimation can be substantially reduced by a better choice of estimators. Specifically, an exponentially smoothed average and a modified exponentially smoothed mean absolute deviation are shown to outperform the sample mean and standard deviation for a wide range of computer simulated and U.S. Air Force empirical demands when the (s, S) policies are calculated using Ehrhardt's Power Approximation. Those situations in which the method of demand parameter estimation has negligible impact on total system cost are also indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond A. Jacobs & Harvey M. Wagner, 1989. "Reducing Inventory System Costs by Using Robust Demand Estimators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(7), pages 771-787, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:7:p:771-787
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.7.771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.7.771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.35.7.771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Strijbosch, L. W. G. & Moors, J. J. A., 2005. "The impact of unknown demand parameters on (R,S)-inventory control performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 805-815, May.
    2. L W G Strijbosch & R M J Heuts & E H M van der Schoot, 2000. "A combined forecast—inventory control procedure for spare parts," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(10), pages 1184-1192, October.
    3. Anne E. Lordahl & James H. Bookbinder, 1994. "Order‐statistic calculation, costs, and service in an (s, Q) inventory system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 81-97, February.
    4. Harvey M. Wagner, 2002. "And Then There Were None," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 217-226, February.
    5. Hasni, M. & Aguir, M.S. & Babai, M.Z. & Jemai, Z., 2019. "On the performance of adjusted bootstrapping methods for intermittent demand forecasting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 145-153.
    6. Refik Güllü, 1996. "On the value of information in dynamic production/inventory problems under forecast evolution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 289-303, March.
    7. Strijbosch, L.W.G. & Moors, J.J.A., 1998. "Inventory Control : The Impact of Unknown Demand Distribution," Other publications TiSEM bf5529df-b993-4816-9839-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:7:p:771-787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.