IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v31y1985i7p814-828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parallel Funding of R&D Tasks with Probabilistic Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan F. Bard

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem commonly faced by R&D managers of funding redundant R&D tasks across several stages or components of a project. In the proposed methodology it is assumed that task outcomes are random, but that their distribution can be determined from engineering inputs. In order to account for individual preferences a utility function is used to measure overall project results, and hence guide the decisions at each stage. The problem is formulated as a probabilistic network and solved by means of a heuristic comprising simulation and dynamic programming. Although computational experience is limited, the results obtained from a number of examples associated with the development of a photovoltaic solar module were quite promising; that is, the heuristic always found the optimal investment plan. In general, computational times were minimal when compared to data collection efforts, with the latter perhaps being the principal hurdle to full implementation. The sponsoring organization, however, felt that the unified approach offered by the methodology represented a major improvement over current analytic techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan F. Bard, 1985. "Parallel Funding of R&D Tasks with Probabilistic Outcomes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(7), pages 814-828, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:7:p:814-828
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.31.7.814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.7.814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.31.7.814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boaz Golany & Moshe Kress & Michal Penn & Uriel G. Rothblum, 2012. "Resource allocation in an asymmetric technology race with temporary advantages," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 128-145, March.
    2. B. De Reyck & Y. Grushka-Cockayne & R. Leus, 2007. "A New Challenge in Project Scheduling. The Incorporation of Activity Failures," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 410-435.
    3. Scott A. Shane & Karl T. Ulrich, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 133-144, February.
    4. Yigal Gerchak & Christian Schmid, 2022. "Principal–agent models where a principal is only affected by extreme performances," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 468-477, March.
    5. Wenhui Zhao & Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Project Evaluation and Selection with Task Failures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 428-446, February.
    6. Murthy, Ishwar & Sarkar, Sumit, 1997. "Exact algorithms for the stochastic shortest path problem with a decreasing deadline utility function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 209-229, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:7:p:814-828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.