IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v25y1995i5p151-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thirty Years of Modeling Midair Collisions

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Machol

    (2101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, No. 77, Washington, DC 20008-1761)

Abstract

For 30 years, operations researchers have developed mathematical models of processes leading to possible collisions of aircraft flying in proximity to one another in order to estimate the risk of collision. These “collision risk models” were applied in the 1960s to determine safe separation standards between pairs of co-altitude aircraft on parallel courses over the North Atlantic Ocean. The models have been and are being continually refined and improved. They have been applied to different geographic regions (for example, the Pacific Ocean and domestic airspace), to different flight regimes (for example, high-altitude cruise and landing on closely spaced runways), and to different types of separation (vertical and longitudinal as well as lateral).

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Machol, 1995. "Thirty Years of Modeling Midair Collisions," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 151-172, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:25:y:1995:i:5:p:151-172
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.25.5.151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.25.5.151
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.25.5.151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanif D. Sherali & J. Cole Smith & Antonio A. Trani & Srinivas Sale, 2000. "National Airspace Sector Occupancy and Conflict Analysis Models for Evaluating Scenarios under the Free-Flight Paradigm," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 321-336, November.
    2. Anders la Cour‐Harbo & Henrik Schiøler, 2019. "Probability of Low‐Altitude Midair Collision Between General Aviation and Unmanned Aircraft," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2499-2513, November.
    3. Arnold Barnett, 1999. "A "Parallel Approach" Path to Estimating Collision Risk During Simultaneous Landings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 382-394, March.
    4. Arnold Barnett, 2000. "Free-Flight and en Route Air Safety: A First-Order Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 833-845, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:25:y:1995:i:5:p:151-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.