IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v31y2019i1p100-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Optimization of Dose-Volume Metrics for Prostate HDR-Brachytherapy Incorporating Target and OAR Volume Delineation Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Marleen Balvert

    (Department of Econometrics and Operations Research/Center for Economic Research (CentER), Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 1098 XG Amsterdam, Netherlands, Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands)

  • Dick den Hertog

    (Department of Econometrics and Operations Research/Center for Economic Research (CentER), Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands)

  • Aswin L. Hoffmann

    (Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands)

Abstract

In radiation therapy planning, uncertainties in the definition of the target volume yield a risk of underdosing the tumor. The traditional corrective action in the context of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) expands the clinical target volume (CTV) with an isotropic margin to obtain the planning target volume (PTV). However, the EBRT-based PTV concept is not directly applicable to brachytherapy (BT) since it can lead to undesirable dose escalation. Here, we present a treatment plan optimization model that uses worst-case robust optimization to account for delineation uncertainties in interstitial high-dose-rate BT of the prostate. A scenario-based method was developed that handles uncertainties in index sets. Heuristics were included to reduce the calculation times to acceptable proportions. The approach was extended to account for delineation uncertainties of an organ at risk (OAR) as well. The method was applied on data from prostate cancer patients and evaluated in terms of commonly used dosimetric performance criteria for the CTV and relevant OARs. The robust optimization approach was compared against the classical PTV margin concept and against a scenario-based CTV margin approach. The results show that the scenario-based margin and the robust optimization method are capable of reducing the risk of underdosage to the tumor. As expected, the scenario-based CTV margin approach leads to dose escalation within the target, whereas this can be prevented with the robust model. For cases where rectum sparing was a binding restriction, including uncertainties in rectum delineation in the planning model led to a reduced risk of a rectum overdose, and in some cases, to reduced targetcoverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Marleen Balvert & Dick den Hertog & Aswin L. Hoffmann, 2019. "Robust Optimization of Dose-Volume Metrics for Prostate HDR-Brachytherapy Incorporating Target and OAR Volume Delineation Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 100-114, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:31:y:2019:i:1:p:100-114
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2018.0815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0815
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Bortfeld & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Alexei Trofimov & John N. Tsitsiklis, 2008. "Robust Management of Motion Uncertainty in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1461-1473, December.
    2. Peters, Koen & Fleuren, H.A. & den Hertog, Dick & Kavelj, Mirjana & Silva, Sergio & Goncalves, Rui & Ergun, Ozlem & Soldner, Mallory, 2016. "The Nutritious Supply Chain : Optimizing Humanitarian Food Aid," Discussion Paper 2016-044, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danielle A. Ripsman & Thomas G. Purdie & Timothy C. Y. Chan & Houra Mahmoudzadeh, 2022. "Robust Direct Aperture Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2017-2038, July.
    2. Wei Chen & Yixin Lu & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Designing Personalized Treatment Plans for Breast Cancer," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 932-949, September.
    3. Soroush Saghafian & Nikolaos Trichakis & Ruihao Zhu & Helen A. Shih, 2023. "Joint patient selection and scheduling under no‐shows: Theory and application in proton therapy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 547-563, February.
    4. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mahmoudzadeh, Houra & Purdie, Thomas G., 2014. "A robust-CVaR optimization approach with application to breast cancer therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 876-885.
    5. Baharmand, Hossein & Comes, Tina & Lauras, Matthieu, 2019. "Bi-objective multi-layer location–allocation model for the immediate aftermath of sudden-onset disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 86-110.
    6. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    7. Velibor V Mišić & Timothy C Y Chan, 2015. "The Perils of Adapting to Dose Errors in Radiation Therapy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Justin J. Boutilier & Timothy C. Y. Chan, 2023. "Introducing and Integrating Machine Learning in an Operations Research Curriculum: An Application-Driven Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 64-83, January.
    9. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mišić, Velibor V., 2013. "Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 745-756.
    10. Vishal Gupta & Brian Rongqing Han & Song-Hee Kim & Hyung Paek, 2020. "Maximizing Intervention Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5576-5598, December.
    11. Saghafian, Soroush & Trichakis, Nikolaos & Zhu, Ruihao & Shih, Helen A., 2019. "Joint Patient Selection and Scheduling under No-Shows: Theory and Application in Proton Therapy," Working Paper Series rwp19-019, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    12. Dominic J. Breuer & Shashank Kapadia & Nadia Lahrichi & James C. Benneyan, 2022. "Joint robust optimization of bed capacity, nurse staffing, and care access under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 673-689, May.
    13. Mehdi Karimi & Somayeh Moazeni & Levent Tunçel, 2018. "A Utility Theory Based Interactive Approach to Robustness in Linear Optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 811-842, April.
    14. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Kaw, Neal, 2020. "Inverse optimization for the recovery of constraint parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 415-427.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:31:y:2019:i:1:p:100-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.