IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

An experimental analysis of Colonel Blotto Games under alternative environments

Listed author(s):
  • Yetkin ÇINAR

    (Ankara Üniversitesi SBF)

  • Türkmen GÖKSEL

    (Ankara Üniversitesi SBF)

In this paper, we design an experiment based on the Colonel Blotto game with complete information under auction method in which the player allocating more resources to a battlefield wins with certainty. The main contribution of this paper is that we allow the same player to play sequentially under different environments (symmetric and asymmetric resources and different number of battlefields) against computer. Consistent with the theoretical predictions, we find that most of the time players use a ‘complete coverage’ strategy when they have equal or more resources than the opponent and use a ‘guerilla warfare’ strategy when they have fewer resources. We also find that an individual player’s success is relatively high when the player has equal or more resources than the opponent. Finally, we observe that there is an improvement in players’ success both within a treatment and across similar treatments which can be explained by “learning” argument.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Bilgesel Yayincilik in its journal İktisat İşletme ve Finans.

Volume (Year): 27 (2012)
Issue (Month): 312 ()
Pages: 39-57

in new window

Handle: RePEc:iif:iifjrn:v:27:y:2012:i:312:p:39-57
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iif:iifjrn:v:27:y:2012:i:312:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ali Bilge)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.