IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jabim0/v14y2023i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants and Influences of Information Systems Integration in a Public Higher Education Context

Author

Listed:
  • Norshidah Mohamed

    (Prince Sultan University, Saudi Arabia)

  • Batiah Mahadi

    (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Suraya Miskon

    (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Hanif Haghshenas

    (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

In this study, the authors used the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and DeLone and McLean's upstream information systems (IS) success model to construct and test a model that describes IS integration and its determinants and influences. The researchers modified the TOE model to include business and knowledge factors. Using a cross-sectional research design, they distributed survey questionnaires to participants at a Malaysian public higher education institution. The authors analyzed the data using partial least squares structural equation modelling. The results suggested that IS integration influences system quality and information quality positively. Contrary to extant findings, only knowledge, environmental, and business factors determined IS integration directly. The authors discuss the implications of these results for IS integration and future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Norshidah Mohamed & Batiah Mahadi & Suraya Miskon & Hanif Haghshenas, 2023. "Determinants and Influences of Information Systems Integration in a Public Higher Education Context," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJABIM.330987
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Hillol Bala, 2012. "Adoption and Impacts of Interorganizational Business Process Standards: Role of Partnering Synergy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1131-1157, December.
    2. Schultz, Carsten & Graw, Jan & Salomo, Søren & Kock, Alexander, 2019. "How Project Management and Top Management Involvement Affect the Innovativeness of Professional Service Organizations - An Empirical Study on Hospitals," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 118971, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Titah, Ryad & Shuraida, Shadi & Rekik, Yacine, 2016. "Integration breach: Investigating the effect of internal and external information sharing and coordination on firm profit," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 34-47.
    2. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Narcyz Roztocki & Heinz Roland Weistroffer, 2015. "Investments in enterprise integration technology: An event study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 659-672, June.
    4. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.
    5. Alsaad, Abdallah & Taamneh, Abdallah, 2019. "The effect of international pressures on the cross-national diffusion of business-to-business e-commerce," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Hüseyin Tanriverdi & Arun Rai & N. Venkatraman, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 822-834, December.
    7. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    8. S Sivadasan & J Smart & L Huaccho Huatuco & A Calinescu, 2010. "Operational complexity and supplier–customer integration: case study insights and complexity rebound," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(12), pages 1709-1718, December.
    9. Chaitanya Sambhara & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2022. "Configuring the Enterprise Systems Portfolio: The Role of Information Risk," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 446-463, June.
    10. Tobias D. Herbst & J. Piet Hausberg, 2024. "Improving Innovation Performance by Means of Open Innovation: The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Information Technology Capability," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-31, May.
    11. Nicholas Berente & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo & John Leslie King, 2016. "Routines as Shock Absorbers During Organizational Transformation: Integration, Control, and NASA’s Enterprise Information System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 551-572, June.
    12. Aboelmaged, Mohamed Gamal, 2014. "Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 639-651.
    13. Xin Chen & Qizhi Dai & Chaohong Na, 2019. "The value of enterprise information systems under different corporate governance aspects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 223-247, December.
    14. Ekaterina Novozhilova & Kate Mays & James E. Katz, 2024. "Looking towards an automated future: U.S. attitudes towards future artificial intelligence instantiations and their effect," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Susan Scott & Wanda Orlikowski, 2022. "The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 311-336, March.
    16. Ning Jia & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2020. "Reducing Capital Market Anomaly: The Role of Information Technology Using an Information Uncertainty Lens," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 979-1001, February.
    17. Viswanath Venkatesh & Hillol Bala & V. Sambamurthy, 2016. "Implementation of an Information and Communication Technology in a Developing Country: A Multimethod Longitudinal Study in a Bank in India," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 558-579, September.
    18. Francesco Rizzi & Irene Bartolozzi & Alessandra Borghini & Marco Frey, 2013. "Environmental Management of End‐of‐Life Products: Nine Factors of Sustainability in Collaborative Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 561-572, December.
    19. Scott, Susan V. & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2022. "The digital undertow: how the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Mohd Hizam-Hanafiah & Mansoor Ahmed Soomro, 2021. "The Situation of Technology Companies in Industry 4.0 and the Open Innovation," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.