From complexities to the rules of thumb: towards optimisation in pricing decisions
This study is arguing that management would benefit in pricing decision from simple rules of thumb more than from complicated models. These rules are easy to use and they provide management with useful support to move towards optimisation and to diminish gap between theory and practice. This paper presents three kinds of rules for pricing decision dealing with multi-product pricing, dynamic pricing and pricing objective function. The rules are adjusted versions of the Amoroso-Robinson rule. The paper also presents survey evidence on pricing decisions in Finnish firms. This evidence is based on a questionnaire responded by 205 firms. Finnish firms tend to use cost-plus pricing and are largely full-cost adopters although many of them report maximising objectives for pricing. Evidence shows that the firms are able and motivated to apply analytical methods for pricing. However, only 22% of the firms have adopted optimisation models in pricing decisions.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 1 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:1:y:2009:i:4:p:340-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.