IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeima/v11y2010i4p440-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rewarding in open innovation communities – how to motivate members

Author

Listed:
  • Maria J. Antikainen
  • Heli K. Vaataja

Abstract

In order to attract and enhance users' commitment to participate in online open innovation communities, it is important to know what types of motivators are important for the members. Both monetary and non-monetary rewards can be used for motivating participation. In this study we focus on studying the role of rewarding in online open innovation intermediaries. The data was collected by interviews with the community maintainers of three open innovation intermediaries and by a web survey in the communities maintained by them. In the studied communities, the web survey respondents found monetary rewarding important, as well as non-monetary rewarding based on the quality of ideas. According to the maintainers' interviews, combinations of monetary and non-monetary rewarding are important. In addition, we analysed the rewarding mechanisms in 12 open innovation communities. We found that both monetary and non-monetary rewarding methods are used in the studied open innovation intermediaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria J. Antikainen & Heli K. Vaataja, 2010. "Rewarding in open innovation communities – how to motivate members," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 440-456.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:11:y:2010:i:4:p:440-456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32267
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    2. Milica SUNDIC & Karl-Heinz LEITNER, 2013. "Crowdsourcing as an Innovation Strategy: A Study on Innovation Platforms in Austria and Switzerland," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(89), pages 55-72, 1st quart.
    3. Eleftherios K. Soleas, 2020. "Leader strategies for motivating innovation in individuals: a systematic review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Idota, Hiroki & Nakaya, Joji & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2019. "Why Consumers Commit Voluntarily to Collaborative Innovation with Firms by Using Social Media?: Case of Japanese consumers," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205183, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Ha Ta & Terry L. Esper & Travis Tokar, 2021. "Appealing to the Crowd: Motivation Message Framing and Crowdsourcing Performance in Retail Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3192-3212, September.
    6. Mark Boons & Daan Stam & Harry G. Barkema, 2015. "Feelings of Pride and Respect as Drivers of Ongoing Member Activity on Crowdsourcing Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 717-741, September.
    7. Zhenzhen Zhao & Damien Renard & Mehdi Elmoukhliss & Christine Balague, 2016. "What Affects Creative Performance In Idea Co-Creation: Competitive, Cooperative Or Coopetitive Climate?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Hossain, Mokter, 2018. "Motivations, challenges, and opportunities of successful solvers on an innovation intermediary platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 67-73.
    9. Tuba Bakici & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2011. "Motives for Participation in On-Line Open Innovation Platforms," DRUID Working Papers 11-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Prpić, John, 2017. "Next Generation Crowdsourcing for Collective Intelligence," SocArXiv juqk6, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeima:v:11:y:2010:i:4:p:440-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.