IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v19y2019i2p285-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility, employee productivity and firm valuation

Author

Listed:
  • Shieh-Liang Chen
  • Cheng-Kun Liu
  • Chia-Ying Liu

Abstract

This paper first examines whether the more investments in corporate social responsibility (CSR), the less likely the share prices will be undervalued by the market. Secondly, we analyse whether there is a positive correlation between the spending on CSR and the company's productivity and explore the impact of CSR on future financial performance of a firm. The findings show that if the spending on CSR is high in the prior or/and current periods, current share prices are less likely to be undervalued. A stronger focus on CSR in the prior or/and current periods does not lead to higher productivity. This is possible because the input of CSR has no influence on the incentives to employees. In addition, the more efforts in CSR in the prior or current periods, the better is the future financial performance. This study, hence, concludes that CSR input can mitigate undervaluation and improve future operation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shieh-Liang Chen & Cheng-Kun Liu & Chia-Ying Liu, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility, employee productivity and firm valuation," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 285-303.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:19:y:2019:i:2:p:285-303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=102235
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lashkaripour, Mohammadhossein, 2023. "ESG tail risk: The Covid-19 market crash analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Sandra Aulia & Haula Rosdiana & Inayati Inayati, 2022. "Trust, Power, and Tax Risk into the “Slippery Slope”: A Corporate Tax Compliance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Christophe Boucher & Wassim Le Lann & Stéphane Matton & Sessi Tokpavi, 2023. "Are ESG ratings informative to forecast idiosyncratic risk?," Working Papers hal-04140193, HAL.
    4. Arfah Habib Saragih & Syaiful Ali, 2023. "Corporate tax risk: a literature review and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 527-577, June.
    5. Bing Yu & Shengxiong Wu & Mary Jane Lenard, 2022. "Do Ethical Companies Have High Stock Prices or High Returns?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    6. José Solana‐Ibáñez & Manuel Caravaca‐Garratón & Ricardo Teruel‐Sánchez, 2020. "Stakeholder perception on corporate reputation and management efficiency: Evidence from the Spanish Defence sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2381-2399, September.
    7. Po‐Hsuan Hsu & Kai Li & Chi‐Yang Tsou, 2023. "The Pollution Premium," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(3), pages 1343-1392, June.
    8. Andrzej Janowski, 2020. "Philanthropy and the Contribution of Andrew Carnegie to Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Tianli Feng & Fan Yang & Biao Tan & Jihong Wu, 2022. "Corporate Social Irresponsibility Punishments from Stakeholders—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:19:y:2019:i:2:p:285-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.