IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v18y2026i2p69.html

Attitudes on Aging and Perceptions of Late-Life Suicide among Younger and Older Adults: A Test of the Cultural Scripts Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kadija N. Williams
  • Daniel L. Segal
  • Leilani Feliciano
  • Frederick L. Coolidge

Abstract

Introduction. Suicide is a major public health concern among older adults. An important and emerging area of study concerns perspectives, attitudes, and cultural beliefs about suicide in later life. This study examined perspectives of younger and older adults on late-life suicide using the cultural scripts model, which proposes that suicidal behavior is more likely in contexts where it is culturally permissible. Method. Using a cross-sectional research design, younger adults (N = 376) and older adults (N = 70) read a fictional obituary of an older adult who died by suicide. Participants rated 10 potential precipitants and eight protective factors and completed measures of age stereotype, age distancing, suicidality, and reasons for living. Results. Among older adults, acceptability of late-life suicide was associated with age distancing (r = .30). Age stereotyping was associated with suicidality (r = .58), age distancing (r = .68), and acceptability of late-life suicide (r = .37). Compared to older adults, younger adults rated five precipitants as more likely to lead to suicide- family discord, employment change/retirement, relationship dissolution, social isolation, and terminal illness in a relative. Younger adults also agreed more with the decedent’s decision to die by suicide on ratings for six precipitants- family discord, death of a close relative, employment change/retirement, relationship dissolution, social isolation, and terminal illness in a relative. In contrast, older adults expressed greater agreement only in the context of severe health problems. Regarding protectants, older adults rated one protectant (financial resources) as more likely to prevent suicide and showed greater agreement with the decision not to die by suicide for three protectants- participation in religious activities, financial resources, and medical treatment for non-psychological illness. Discussion. Age cohort was associated with differences in interpretations of late-life suicide, supporting the value of the cultural scripts model for understanding age-related differences in suicide perceptions. Greater attention to age-related suicide scripts, particularly those that normalize suicide in the context of aging and illness, should be considered as part of comprehensive late-life suicide prevention efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kadija N. Williams & Daniel L. Segal & Leilani Feliciano & Frederick L. Coolidge, 2026. "Attitudes on Aging and Perceptions of Late-Life Suicide among Younger and Older Adults: A Test of the Cultural Scripts Model," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(2), pages 1-69, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/0/0/53165/57979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/0/53165
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.