IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v15y2021i11p79.html

Performance Appraisal of Technological Innovation in Military-Civilian Enterprises—Empirical Evidence from Jiangsu Military-Civilian Integration Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao L. J.
  • Xun Z. X.

Abstract

The development of military-civilian dual-use high-tech and joint technological innovation is important for military-civilian integration enterprises to develop in-depth military-civilian integration. Taking 10 military-civilian listed enterprises in Jiangsu Province as the research objects, and using DEA-BBC model and DEA-Malmquist index method, this paper constructs an evaluation system for technological innovation performance of enterprises, evaluates and studies the innovation performance from 2016 to 2019. The research shows that the technological innovation performance of enterprises is generally low. The main reasons of this situation are backward technology, low resource utilization, and the uneven management capabilities of enterprises. In addition, this paper provides some suggestions for improving the technological innovation performance of military-civilian enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao L. J. & Xun Z. X., 2021. "Performance Appraisal of Technological Innovation in Military-Civilian Enterprises—Empirical Evidence from Jiangsu Military-Civilian Integration Enterprises," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(11), pages 1-79, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:11:p:79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/43966/46250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/43966
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andy Cosh & Xiaolan Fu & Alan Hughes, 2012. "Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 301-317, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blomkvist, Katarina & Engzell, Jeanette & Kappen, Philip & Zander, Ivo, 2024. "How organizational conditions affect employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Spyros Arvanitis & Florian Seliger & Tobias Stucki, 2013. "The Relative Importance of Human Resource Management Practices for a Firm's Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-341, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    3. Paola Rovelli & Vincenzo Butticè, 2020. "On the organizational design of entrepreneurial ventures: the configurations of the entrepreneurial team," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(2), pages 243-269, June.
    4. Vincenzo Butticè & Annalisa Croce & Elisa Ughetto, 2023. "Gender Diversity, Role Congruity and the Success of VC Investments," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(5), pages 1660-1698, September.
    5. Wendy L. Martin & Alexander McKelvie & G. T. Lumpkin, 2016. "Centralization and delegation practices in family versus non-family SMEs: a Rasch analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 755-769, October.
    6. Yan Zuo & Shenyang Jiang & Jiang Wei, 2022. "Can corporate social responsibility mitigate the liability of newness? Evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 573-592, August.
    7. Ricardo Malagueño & Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Jacobo Gomez-Conde, 2018. "Balanced scorecard in SMEs: effects on innovation and financial performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 221-244, June.
    8. Maximilian Palmié & Marco Zeschky & Stephan Winterhalter & Philipp Walter Sauter & Naomi Haefner & Oliver Gassmann, 2016. "Coordination mechanisms for international innovation in SMEs: effects on time-to-market and R&D task complexity as a moderator," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 273-294, February.
    9. Emilio Domínguez Escrig & Francisco Fermín Mallén Broch & Rafael Lapiedra Alcamí & Ricardo Chiva Gómez, 2020. "How to enhance radical innovation? The importance of organizational design and generative learning," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1101-1122, October.
    10. Wolfgang Herb & Maria Lotze & Wolfgang Schultze & Philipp Sandner, 2025. "Real effects of capitalized research and development expenditures: a leading indicator for future innovation performance?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 417-473, January.
    11. Jiang Wei & Yang Yang & Sali Li, 2021. "Mirror or no mirror? Architectural design of cross-border integration of Chinese multinational enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1399-1430, December.
    12. Jeng Liu, 2018. "Successors’ Characteristics, Preparation, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Taiwan and Japan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Theresia Gunawan & Jojo Jacob & Geert Duysters, 2016. "Network ties and entrepreneurial orientation: Innovative performance of SMEs in a developing country," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 575-599, June.
    14. AliyuMukhtar Shehu & Rosli Mahmood, 2014. "The Impact of Business Environment on SME Performance in Nigeria," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(8), pages 582-592.
    15. Khairia Ghuloum Al Maazmi & Yazid Abdullahi Abubakar & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, 2024. "Linking Hierarchy Culture, Market Culture and Innovation Orientation: Moderating Roles of Causation and Effectuation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 378-388, October.
    16. Clauss, Thomas & Kesting, Tobias & Franco, Matheus, 2024. "Innovation generation through formalisation and fairness in university – Industry collaboration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Jean-Etienne Joullié & Robert Spillane, 2021. "The language of integrative collective bargaining," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(3), pages 472-488, September.
    18. Vincenzo Butticè & Massimo G. Colombo & Paola Rovelli, 2024. "Venture capital and the delegation of decision authority in startups: an exploratory study," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 51(4), pages 893-923, December.
    19. Sang Chang & Jie Wu & Muhammad Riaz & Zhizhong Hu, 2023. "How does equity restriction affect innovation quality? Evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Ansita Aggarwal & Harold Kent Baker & Nisarg A. Joshi, 2025. "Organizational Innovation as Business Strategy: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 6550-6576, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:11:p:79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.