IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v13y2020i10p13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Alignments between SDG16 and the Other Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Wakwe Lawrence
  • Noel Ihebuzor
  • Damiete Onyema Lawrence

Abstract

SDG16 cuts through, affects and is affected by the other 16 SDGs. This study involved a number of steps; the first step was computing the degrees of compatibility/alignments of SDG16 targets as individual targets against the targets of the other 16 SDGs using a scoring system that ranged from -3 to +3. The next step in data treatment involved computing the means for each row in each table to get the compatibility scores between SDG16 targets and each goal and then we used the columns to compare the SDG16 with the targets of each of the other goals. The final steps involved computing the mean compatibility scores between the SDG16 goal and the goals of the other SDGs on one hand and those between the SDG16 targets and the other 16 SDGs on the other. The approach is based on the strategic management principle that objectives and targets are set in ways that their achievement help in the achievement of the aspirations of the goal. The study approach is new, and it has not been done before. The compatibility examination showed that the aspirations embedded in the development of SDG2 (Zero Hunger) targets and those of SDG16 were least aligned and do not effectively support each other. SDG16 and SDG5 (Gender equality) were the most aligned, suggesting that the achievement of the SDG16 targets go a long way in supporting the achievement of SDG5 targets. An approach like this can be used as stand alone or in conjunction with the often used qualitative methods and will be a very helpful tool during SDG or related reviews, as it is useful in identifying targets and goals with high mutual transfer benefits among themselves. The study concludes with some recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Wakwe Lawrence & Noel Ihebuzor & Damiete Onyema Lawrence, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Alignments between SDG16 and the Other Sustainable Development Goals," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/43642/45841
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/43642
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahman, Farhana Nur & Sen, Kanchan Kumar & Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2025. "Good governance and energy justice: Pathways to human development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Landry Egbende & Daniel Helldén & Branly Mbunga & Mattias Schedwin & Benito Kazenza & Nina Viberg & Rhoda Wanyenze & Mapatano Mala Ali & Tobias Alfvén, 2023. "Interactions between Health and the Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Noel Ihebuzor & Damiete O. Lawrence & Anthony Wakwe Lawrence, 2021. "Policy Coherence and Mandate Overlaps as Sources of Major Challenges in Public Sector Management in Nigeria," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-68, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.