IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v16y2026i2p337.html

Exploring Pre-service EFL Teachers' Perceptions of AI-Generated Feedback and Teacher Feedforward in Argumentative Writing: A Process-Genre Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Siwaporn Saito
  • Supong Tangkiengsirisin

Abstract

This study investigates pre-service EFL teachers' perceptions of AI-generated feedback and teacher feedforward in the development of argumentative writing within a process-genre instructional framework. Grounded in feedback theory and conceptualized through a dual-level mediation perspective, the study positions AI as providing micro-level linguistic support, while teacher feedforward facilitates macro-level rhetorical development. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving 22 third-year pre-service teachers enrolled in an academic writing course at a Thai university. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings reveal that learners perceived AI-generated feedback as highly effective in identifying language-related issues and supporting immediate revision. In contrast, teacher feedforward was viewed as essential for improving argument structure, idea development, and overall coherence. Importantly, participants highlighted the complementary roles of AI and teacher feedback, which together enhanced their awareness of the writing process, confidence in revision, and engagement in autonomous learning. The study contributes to the growing body of research on AI in L2 writing by offering an integrated perspective on feedback mediation and highlighting the pedagogical value of combining AI-supported and teacher-guided feedback within a process-genre approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Siwaporn Saito & Supong Tangkiengsirisin, 2026. "Exploring Pre-service EFL Teachers' Perceptions of AI-Generated Feedback and Teacher Feedforward in Argumentative Writing: A Process-Genre Perspective," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 337-337, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/53206/58038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/53206
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.