Author
Listed:
- Xinlei Song
- Julamas Jansrisukot
- Pattawan Narjaikaew
Abstract
This study explored the effectiveness of an instructional model integrating flipped classroom and collaborative learning in enhancing the BIM modeling ability of Chinese undergraduate architectural engineering students. The study involved 45 third-year undergraduate students in architectural engineering who were enrolled in an 8-week BIM course. The research adopted a one-group repeated-measures design, with three phased assessments conducted at T1, T2, and T3 during the 6-week instructional intervention. A final post-test (T4) was administered in the 7th week to monitor and track the development of students' BIM modeling abilities over time. BIM modeling ability was evaluated across three core dimensions including BIM theoretical knowledge, BIM family modeling and BIM project modeling using a standardized scoring rubric. Two independent professional raters assessed the subjective components, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated to examine interrater reliability. All ICC values were above 0.90, indicating excellent agreement between raters. A range of statistical analyses was conducted, including descriptive statistics, a one-sample t-test, and repeated-measures ANOVA. The findings showed that students' overall mean BIM modeling ability scores increased steadily and significantly from 62.80 at T1 to 80.04 at T4, with statistical significance at p < .001. Substantial improvements were observed across all three core dimensions, and the effect sizes reached a large effect level. Qualitative analyses of classroom observations and students' test papers revealed noticeable improvements in learning initiative and collaborative engagement. However, students with low performance levels continued to experience difficulties in areas such as material configuration, dimensional accuracy, and the application of complex commands. Results from a post-intervention satisfaction survey using five-point Likert scale indicated strong student approval of the instructional approach. Mean scores ranged from 3.44 to 4.60, with most items rated at a highly high level. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the integrated instructional model significantly enhanced students' BIM modeling ability and also fostered more effective learning behaviors, offering meaningful practical implications for BIM instruction in architectural engineering education.
Suggested Citation
Xinlei Song & Julamas Jansrisukot & Pattawan Narjaikaew, 2026.
"Enhancing BIM Modeling Ability of Undergraduate Architectural Engineering Students through the Integration of Flipped Classroom and Collaborative Learning,"
Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 237-237, May.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:237
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.