IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v16y2026i2p193.html

Scaffolding Success: The Role of Course Syllabi in Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Hamsa Mahafza
  • N. Michelle Greene

Abstract

Course syllabi are traditionally viewed as administrative documents outlining course objectives, policies, schedules, and grading criteria. However, recent research indicates that syllabi can serve as critical scaffolding tools that support student self-efficacy and engagement in higher education. Guided by Bandura's (1997) Social Cognitive Theory found in Self-efficacy- The Exercise of Control, this qualitative study examined undergraduate students' perceptions of a standardized syllabus template implemented campus-wide at a mid-sized public university in Alabama. Seven students from diverse majors participated in a focus group discussion, reflecting on how syllabus structure, clarity, tone, and content influenced their confidence, planning, and classroom engagement. Findings revealed that well-structured syllabi functioned as both cognitive and socio-emotional scaffolds, enhancing students' self-efficacy, reducing stress, and promoting active participation. Conversely, unclear instructions, misaligned course goals, or negative language were perceived as barriers to engagement and motivation. These results underscore the potential of thoughtfully designed syllabi to scaffold student success, improve academic performance, and foster meaningful classroom engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamsa Mahafza & N. Michelle Greene, 2026. "Scaffolding Success: The Role of Course Syllabi in Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Engagement," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 193-193, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/53080/57881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/53080
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.