IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v16y2026i2p110.html

Navigating Teaching Complexities in Graduate Education: An Autoethnographic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anirutt Somsao

Abstract

This study aims to (1) explore the process of using autoethnographic reflection to identify teaching complexities in graduate education, (2) analyze the issues revealed through this reflective process, and (3) interpret the meanings and contexts of these challenges from the instructor's perspective. Employing an autoethnographic methodology, data were collected from the researchers's personal journals, memories, and relevant documents, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that autoethnographic reflection serves as a powerful tool for gaining an in-depth understanding of teaching complexities in graduate settings. Four major themes emerged- expectations and roles, relationships and power, learning approaches, and emotions and identity. These themes are interconnected with the instructor's self-identity and the institutional cultural context. The reflective process not only revealed the multidimensional nature of teaching as an identity practice but also fostered self-awareness, emotional growth, and adaptive teaching capacity. The study highlights the value of autoethnographic reflection as both a research methodology and a professional development approach that promotes transformative learning, adaptability, and pedagogical resilience in the dynamic landscape of graduate education.

Suggested Citation

  • Anirutt Somsao, 2026. "Navigating Teaching Complexities in Graduate Education: An Autoethnographic Perspective," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 110-110, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/53017/57809
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/53017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.