IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v16y2026i1p350.html

Proposing the 5Ps Typology of Distractors for EFL Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Patsawut Sukserm

Abstract

This paper outlines the importance of distractors in the construction and multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in EFL educational assessment. Distractors are integral to understanding student comprehension and differentiating among varying degrees of mastery. The purpose is to examine the impact of constructive distractors on educational objectives, effectiveness, and the assessment reliability and validity of multiple-choice questions. The study proposes the 5Ps typology of distractors, identifying five distinct types of distractors—plausible, peripheral, polyconceptual, prejudicial, and pragmatic—and demonstrates the diverse types of distractors that can be utilized to tackle specific conceptual and linguistic hurdles of the respondents. The use of different types of distractors in various assessment contexts is evidenced by the examples. These reinforce the assertion that distractors can enhance the assessment and learning function of MCQs. This seeks to enhance the equity, efficiency and educational quality of MCQs in assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Patsawut Sukserm, 2026. "Proposing the 5Ps Typology of Distractors for EFL Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Tests," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(1), pages 350-350, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52840/57604
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52840
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.