IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v15y2025i4p510.html

Are Weigh-ins Pedagogically Justified in Postsecondary Physical Education and Health?

Author

Listed:
  • Annie Bradette
  • Isabelle Cabot

Abstract

This study focuses on the pedagogical dilemma surrounding the use of anthropometric measurements in postsecondary Physical Education and Health (PEH) courses. On one hand, the rise in obesity, an indicator of chronic disease risk, justifies the teaching of these concepts. On the other hand, addressing the issue of weight may pose a risk to the mental health of some students. Three groups were compared- those who weighed themselves in class (36), those who did so at home (41), and those who chose not to weigh themselves (65). A content analysis was used to examine the reasons behind these choices, while a repeated-measures covariance analysis (ANCOVA) compared learning about body composition, taking into account the motivation to take care of one’s health. Students who chose to weigh themselves demonstrated a better understanding of body composition than those who refused. However, the latter expressed more negative reactions toward the weighing process. Therefore, offering students the choice to participate or not appears to be the most pedagogically appropriate approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Annie Bradette & Isabelle Cabot, 2025. "Are Weigh-ins Pedagogically Justified in Postsecondary Physical Education and Health?," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 510-510, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52475/57152
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52475
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.