IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v15y2025i4p312.html

A Design Thinking-Driven Conceptual Framework for a Creative AI Learning Environment to Enhance Programming Skills (CAILE)

Author

Listed:
  • Tarattakan Pachumwon
  • Thada Jantakoon
  • Rukthin Laoha

Abstract

This study introduces CAILE, a design thinking-driven conceptual framework for a Creative AI Learning Environment, designed to enhance programming skills. Evaluates clarity, appropriateness, and feasibility through expert judgment. Phase 1 synthesized 34 peer-reviewed studies (2019-2025) to articulate CAILE’s structure across three layers- Inputs (Generative AI platform, Design Thinking framework, Creative learning environment, Computational-thinking foundation), Learning Process (Empathize & Define; Ideate with AI; Prototype & Create; Test & Evaluate; Implement & Scale), and Outputs (Programming proficiency, Creative innovation, Critical thinking, 21st-century skills). Phase 2 operationalized these components into a 28-item instrument and gathered ratings from eight experts on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive analyses and publication-ready visualizations (heatmap, section distributions, item-level forest plots, and a dumbbell comparison) were used to summarize evidence. Results show uniformly high to very high appropriateness across items (overall mean ≈ 4.71) with short dispersions. Section means were likewise high, led by Theoretical Alignment & Rigor (≈ 4.79) and Implementation Feasibility (≈ 4.75). A modestly wider spread for Output items indicates where indicator definitions and exemplars can be sharpened without altering favorable central tendencies. Collectively, the findings suggest that CAILE is both conceptually robust and practically actionable, offering a coherent pathway that weaves together generative AI, design thinking, and computational thinking, from empathic problem framing to scalable implementation. Future work will involve conducting design-based classroom trials and psychometric validation of the instrument, as well as examining equity and ethical considerations in AI-supported programming education.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarattakan Pachumwon & Thada Jantakoon & Rukthin Laoha, 2025. "A Design Thinking-Driven Conceptual Framework for a Creative AI Learning Environment to Enhance Programming Skills (CAILE)," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 312-312, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52301/56955
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52301
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawool Jung & Sungeun Suh, 2024. "Enhancing Soft Skills through Generative AI in Sustainable Fashion Textile Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2025. "Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in entrepreneurial education and practice: emerging insights, the GAIN Framework, and research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.