IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v15y2025i4p243.html

AI-Assisted Writing: Exploring Academic Writing Strategies of Graduate Students across Disciplines through Activity Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Chen
  • Zhuoyan Wang
  • Xinyu Zhou

Abstract

With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into academic writing, especially in second language (L2) contexts, there is a pressing need to understand how disciplinary background and AI-mediated environments shape students’ writing strategies. Grounded in Activity Theory, this study investigates the academic writing strategies of Chinese graduate students across disciplines when composing English academic papers with AI assistance. Through semi-structured interviews, the study identifies distinct disciplinary preferences, particularly, arts students emphasize logical coherence and rhetorical organization, while science students prioritize innovation, clarity, and technical accuracy. These differences reflect how disciplinary norms influence strategic behaviors in AI-supported writing contexts. The findings also reveal a blend of shared and discipline-specific strategies shaped by mediational tools, institutional rules, and community expectations. By framing AI as a mediating artifact within writing activity systems, this study highlights the complex interplay between technology, discipline, and strategy use. The results offer valuable insights for designing discipline-sensitive, AI-aware academic writing instruction in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Chen & Zhuoyan Wang & Xinyu Zhou, 2025. "AI-Assisted Writing: Exploring Academic Writing Strategies of Graduate Students across Disciplines through Activity Theory," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 243-243, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52229/56878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52229
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shlomo Argamon & Jeff Dodick & Paul Chase, 2008. "Language use reflects scientific methodology: A corpus-based study of peer-reviewed journal articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 203-238, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Henry Small, 2011. "Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: a preliminary investigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(2), pages 373-388, May.
    3. Amnah Alluqmani & Lior Shamir, 2018. "Writing styles in different scientific disciplines: a data science approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 1071-1085, May.
    4. Adel Daoud & Sebastian Kohl, 2015. "Is there a New Economic Sociology Effect? A Topic Model on the Economic Orientation of Sociology, 1890 to 2014," Working Papers 1520, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    5. Song, Ningyuan & Chen, Kejun & Zhao, Yuehua, 2023. "Understanding writing styles of scientific papers in the IS-LS domain: Evidence from abstracts over the past three decades," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    6. Amon, Julian & Hornik, Kurt, 2022. "Is it all bafflegab? – Linguistic and meta characteristics of research articles in prestigious economics journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.