IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v15y2025i4p101.html

The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Medical Education: A Meta-Analysis of Knowledge, Skills, and Motivation Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Bhibul Hongthong
  • Thada Jantakoon
  • Somsuk Trisupakitti

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a promising educational tool in medical training, offering immersive learning experiences that address traditional limitations in medical education. However, comprehensive evidence regarding VR's overall effectiveness across diverse medical education contexts remains fragmented. To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality interventions compared to traditional educational methods in medical education through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. A systematic literature search was conducted across Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC databases from January 2015 to December 2024. Studies involving medical students, residents, or healthcare professionals using VR-based educational interventions with traditional comparison groups were included. Primary outcomes included knowledge acquisition, skills development, and motivation measures. Standardized mean differences (Cohen's d) were calculated using fixed-effects models, with subgroup analyses by outcome type. Twenty-one studies encompassing 1,527 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall meta-analysis revealed a moderate to significant positive effect favoring VR interventions (d = 0.510, 95% CI- 0.408 to 0.612, p < .001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated differential effectiveness- skills outcomes showed the most significant effect (d = 0.692, p < .001), knowledge outcomes showed moderate effects (d = 0.346, p < .001), while motivation outcomes showed no significant difference (d = 0.054, p = 0.685). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 87.06%). This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting VR's effectiveness in medical education, particularly for skills development and knowledge acquisition. The differential effects suggest VR's strength in enhancing practical competencies. However, substantial heterogeneity highlights the importance of implementation quality and contextual factors. These findings support the strategic integration of VR technology in medical curricula, especially for procedural training and clinical skills development.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhibul Hongthong & Thada Jantakoon & Somsuk Trisupakitti, 2025. "The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Medical Education: A Meta-Analysis of Knowledge, Skills, and Motivation Outcomes," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 101-101, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52138/56768
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52138
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.