IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/hesjnl/v15y2025i3p403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a Short-Term Nursing Occupational Protection Course Using the CIPP Model Insights for Curriculum Development and Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Zhu
  • Kanyarat Sonsupap

Abstract

This study evaluates a short-term nursing occupational protection course using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model to assess its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. A mixed-methods approach was used, with data collected from 84 student questionnaires and interviews with 8 instructors. Findings showed that the course aligned well with occupational safety priorities, improving students' confidence and competencies. However, gaps in resources and hands-on practice opportunities were noted. Recommendations include integrating advanced technologies, expanding experiential learning, and updating instructional materials. The results highlight the course's value in preparing nursing students for workplace safety challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Zhu & Kanyarat Sonsupap, 2025. "Evaluation of a Short-Term Nursing Occupational Protection Course Using the CIPP Model Insights for Curriculum Development and Improvement," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 403-403, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/download/0/0/52094/56717
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/52094
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:hesjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.