IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v8y2016i3p139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Promotion Behaviors and Chronic Diseases of Aging in the Elderly People of Iranshahr*- IR Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Pishkar Mofrad
  • Mozhgan Jahantigh
  • Azizollah Arbabisarjou

Abstract

INTRODUCTION & AIM- Aging is considered as the phenomenon of the day in the health arena of the world and Iran. It is anticipated that there will be an explosion of aging population in Iran in about 2031 and 20-25% of the population will be aged over 60 years. With aging, chronic diseases also increase and diminish the functional ability of older people. On the other hand, increased healthcare costs should be also added to this issue. Health promotion is a concept of process that continues throughout life. As much as health promotion is important in children and adults, it is equally important in older people. In fact, the elderlies, as a group, also acquire many benefits from health promotion behaviors. Due to the increasing elderly population, geriatric health promotion and enhancing the health level of older people is proposed as a health priority that should be properly planned. Hence, the present study has been conducted in this regard and aims to identify behaviors of health promotion and chronic diseases of aging in the elderly people of Iranshahr-Iran.MATERIALS & METHODS- The present research is a cross-sectional descriptive study whose population consists of 425 elderly people aged 60 years and over, who lived in the city of Iranshahr*, IR Iran. The random cluster sampling method has been used to select the research samples. The required information was collected using a questionnaire which was distributed among the older people through visiting their homes; then, the collected data was statistically analyzed using the statistical software of SPSS version 13.FINDINGS- the research findings show that the mean age of older people is and the highest frequency belongs to the age group of 60 years and the maximum age is 92 years. 69.5% of the older people were in the age group of the young elderly (60-69 years) and 44% of them lived with their married children; also 55.8%, 81.9%, 70.5%, and 74.4% of them were respectively female, illiterate, married, and unemployed. The mean score of geriatric health promotion behaviors was in the range of 0-11 and 54.9% of them got the score of the inappropriate health promotion behavior. The most frequent chronic diseases of older people were respectively joint problems (78.9%), sensory problems (64.1%), and hypertension (56.6%). No significant relationship was observed between the score of health promotion behaviors and “the gender, lifestyle and marital status of the older people”, but there was statistically a significant relationship between the score of health promotion behaviors and “the age, education, and job of the older people”.CONCLUSION- Providing training programs for health promotion behaviors in elderly people can improve these behaviors and enhance their health and quality of life and reduce the incidence of chronic diseases in them. The goal of health promotion behaviors is to maintain performance, independence and quality of life; and many studies have demonstrated that the elderly people who aged 60 years and over benefit from health promotion behaviors more than middle-aged people.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Pishkar Mofrad & Mozhgan Jahantigh & Azizollah Arbabisarjou, 2016. "Health Promotion Behaviors and Chronic Diseases of Aging in the Elderly People of Iranshahr*- IR Iran," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 139-139, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/48458/27423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/48458
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orfila, Francesc & Ferrer, Montserrat & Lamarca, Rosa & Tebe, Cristian & Domingo-Salvany, Antonia & Alonso, Jordi, 2006. "Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: The role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2367-2380, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hosein Shahdadi & Abbas Balouchi & Zahra Sepehri & Hosein Rafiemanesh & Awad Magbri & Fereshteh Keikhaie & Ahmad Shahakzehi & Azizullah Sarjou, 2016. "Factors Affecting Hemodialysis Adequacy in Cohort of Iranian Patient with End Stage Renal Disease," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(8), pages 1-50, August.
    2. Arita Murwani & Santoso Santoso & Eny Lestari & Endang S. Sulaeman, 2019. "The Health Promotion Model of Public Health Program for Elderly," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(7), pages 119-119, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Ferretti & Andrea Pozza & Maurilio Pallassini & Lorenzo Righi & Fulvia Marini & Sabrina Adami & Anna Coluccia, 2019. "Gender invariance of dignity in non-terminal elderly patients with chronic diseases: a multicentric study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1645-1656, May.
    2. Natalia Golini & Viviana Egidi, 2016. "The Latent Dimensions of Poor Self-Rated Health: How Chronic Diseases, Functional and Emotional Dimensions Interact Influencing Self-Rated Health in Italian Elderly," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 321-339, August.
    3. Chan-Hee Park & Eunhee Park & Hyun-Min Oh & Su-Jin Lee & Sun-Hee Park & Tae-Du Jung, 2022. "Health-Related Quality of Life According to Sociodemographic Characteristics in the South Korean Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-9, April.
    4. Yount, Kathryn M. & Hoddinott, John & Stein, Aryeh D., 2010. "Disability and self-rated health among older women and men in rural Guatemala: The role of obesity and chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1418-1427, October.
    5. Mier, Nelda & Ory, Marcia G. & Zhan, Dongling & Conkling, Martha & Sharkey, Joseph R. & Burdine, James N., 2008. "Health-related quality of life among Mexican Americans living in colonias at the Texas-Mexico border," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1760-1771, April.
    6. J. Busschbach & B. Wolffenbuttel & L. Annemans & W. Meerding & M. Kołtowska-Häggström, 2011. "Deriving reference values and utilities for the QoL-AGHDA in adult GHD," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 243-252, June.
    7. Yuxi Vania Shi & Sherrie Yi Komiak & Paul Komiak, 2020. "Enhancing seniors’ health-related quality of life:Designing a framework of virtual healthcare information technologies," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(7), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Antonia Raya-Tena & María Isabel Fernández-San-Martin & Jaume Martin-Royo & Rocío Casañas & Glòria Sauch-Valmaña & Cèlia Cols-Sagarra & Elena Navas-Mendez & Roser Masa-Font & Marc Casajuana-Closas & Q, 2021. "Effectiveness of a Psychoeducational Group Intervention Carried Out by Nurses for Patients with Depression and Physical Comorbidity in Primary Care: Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.