IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v9y2016i6p213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguity Tolerance and Perceptual Learning Styles of Chinese EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Haishan Li
  • Qingshun He

Abstract

Ambiguity tolerance and perceptual learning styles are the two influential elements showing individual differences in EFL learning. This research is intended to explore the relationship between Chinese EFL learners’ ambiguity tolerance and their preferred perceptual learning styles. The findings include (1) the learners are sensitive to English ambiguities and are more reliable on the tactile and kinesthetic learning styles than on visual and auditory styles, (2) most Chinese EFL learners have more than one learning style preferences, (3) significant gender difference exists in ambiguity tolerance, but not in perceptual learning style preferences, and (4) the four perceptual learning styles are significantly correlated with ambiguity tolerance and the auditory learning style would exert more influence on ambiguity tolerance than the visual, tactile and kinesthetic learning styles.

Suggested Citation

  • Haishan Li & Qingshun He, 2016. "Ambiguity Tolerance and Perceptual Learning Styles of Chinese EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 213-213, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/59902/32053
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/59902
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.