IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v9y2016i6p176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles Used by Native and Non-native Scholars

Author

Listed:
  • Fatih Gungor
  • Hacer Uysal

Abstract

In the recent years, globalization prepared a ground for English to be the lingua franca of the academia. Thus, most highly prestigious international journals have defined their medium of publications as English. However, even advanced language learners have difficulties in writing their research articles due to the lack of appropriate lexical knowledge and discourse conventions of academia. Considering the fact that the underuse, overuse and misuse of formulaic sequences or lexical bundles are often characterized with non-native writers of English, lexical bundle studies have recently been on the top of the agenda of corpus studies. Although the related literature has represented specific genres or disciplines, no study has scrutinized lexical bundles in the research articles that are written in the educational sciences. Therefore, the current study compared the structural and functional characteristics of the lexical-bundle use in L1 and L2 research articles in English. The results revealed the deviation of the usages of lexical bundles by the non-native speakers of English from the native speaker norms. Furthermore, the results indicated the overuse of clausal or verb-phrase based lexical bundles in the research articles of Turkish scholars while their native counterparts used noun and prepositional phrase-based lexical bundles more than clausal bundles.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatih Gungor & Hacer Uysal, 2016. "A Comparative Analysis of Lexical Bundles Used by Native and Non-native Scholars," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 176-176, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/59841/32029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/59841
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng Lyu & Roger W. Gee, 2020. "Lexical Bundles in Thesis Abstracts by L1 Chinese Learners of English and U.S. Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 141-141, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.