IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v9y2015i1p107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Content and Face Validity of English Language Placement Test Designed by Colleges of Applied Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Sharifa Al-Adawi
  • Aaisha Al-Balushi

Abstract

An English placement test (PT) is an essential component of any foundation program. It helps place students into their suitable language proficiency level so that they do not spend time learning materials below or above their levels. It also helps teachers to prepare teaching materials to students of similar levels (Brown, 2004; Illinois, 2012). This paper aims to investigate the extent to which the PT used at Colleges of Applied Sciences (CAS) is achieving this goal by exploring teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the current exam via questionnaires and interviews. Furthermore, it examines the format and content of the PT and students’ PT score against their mid-term score. It was found that face validity of CAS PT ranged from low (teachers) to moderate (students). The majority of teachers and students emphasized the importance of including the listening and speaking components in the test. Moreover, a modified version of the reading section of the test needs to be incorporated into the test. Another suggested using a valid certified computerized test. For future research, it is recommended to design a new test, taking into consideration the findings of this research and pilot it to test its effectiveness. Furthermore, an analytical test of the current marking criteria is essential to check its clarity and consistency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharifa Al-Adawi & Aaisha Al-Balushi, 2015. "Investigating Content and Face Validity of English Language Placement Test Designed by Colleges of Applied Sciences," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 107-107, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/55566/29771
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/55566
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.