IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v8y2015i6p69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I Love this Approach, But Find It Difficult to Jump in with Two Feet!†Teachers’ Perceived Challenges of Employing Critical Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Hyesun Cho

Abstract

Accompanying myriad definitions of critical literacy is an absence of pedagogical models for implementing critical literacy in teacher education contexts. This action research explores critical literacy with pre-service and in-service teachers in teacher education courses offered in the United States. The primary data sources include online weekly discussions on course readings in the TESOL methods courses I taught in Hawaii and Kansas. First, I propose the working definition of critical literacy in the study (Luke, 2012) and then present course participants’ perceived challenges of employing critical literacy in their current and future classrooms. Findings reveal that despite the differences in the two instructional contexts, both groups recognized that the current standards-based, test-driven educational environment would be the major obstacle for enacting critical literacy in their classroom. In addition, the lack of understanding of critical literacy was addressed by both groups of teachers. I also discuss my struggle and dilemma as a critical teacher educator. Finally, this article concludes with suggestions for introducing critical literacy in teacher education contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyesun Cho, 2015. "“I Love this Approach, But Find It Difficult to Jump in with Two Feet!†Teachers’ Perceived Challenges of Employing Critical Literacy," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-69, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/49408/26592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/49408
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.