IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v8y2015i3p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ Opinions on the Evaluation of ELT Teachers’ Books

Author

Listed:
  • Haedong Kim

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify differences in opinions on the evaluation of ELT teachers’ books between pre-service and in-service teachers. In literature, it has been argued that the development of teachers’ books for EFL teachers can be assisted by the results of a needs analysis. A total of 65 pre-service and 50 in-servicesecondary school teachers from South Korea took part in a survey. There was a high level of agreement for the 22 criteria-items that asked for the evaluative opinions between two groupsas shown through the correlation.85. However, there were statistically different opinions. The pre-service teachers stressed the importance of clear objectives for each lesson, but the in-service teachers emphasized the need for the inclusion of process tests in teachers’ books. Interestingly, there were also different opinions on the use of a teacher’s book. The results from semi-structured interviews revealed that the former plan to use the teacher’s book for their classroom teaching in the future whereas the latter responded that their own notes would be somewhat more useful than teachers’ books. To conclude, it can be proposed that greater emphasis should be placed on gauging preferences of certain groups of teachers in specific EFL contexts for the development of teachers’ books.

Suggested Citation

  • Haedong Kim, 2015. "Teachers’ Opinions on the Evaluation of ELT Teachers’ Books," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 1-1, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/45410/24613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/45410
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.