IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v7y2014i3p159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between University Level and Employment of Language-Learning Strategies: A Study of EAP Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Narjes Ghafournia

Abstract

This study scrutinized the relationship between utilizing language-learning strategies and university levels in reading-comprehension process of language learners in Iran. The participants comprised 406 EAP students at three university levels. The findings reflected significant differences among the students in implementing learning strategies. The students at higher university levels employed overall, direct, and indirect strategies significantly more frequently than the students at the lower stages. The results also revealed that 63% of the variance in the implementation of learning strategies could be due to the participants’ university levels. The findings are of significance because they can help language teachers tailor effective strategic-based language-teaching programs to the academic needs of the students at different stages of learning. The findings can assist language teachers in identifying problematic areas at different stages of learning enabling them to do remedial work with unsuccessful learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Narjes Ghafournia, 2014. "Relationship between University Level and Employment of Language-Learning Strategies: A Study of EAP Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(3), pages 159-159, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:3:p:159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/34249/19571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/34249
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:3:p:159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.